AI Omnibus: The trilogue begins
The European Parliament has adopted its position on the AI Omnibus. Negotiations with the Council and the Commission are now set to begin, bringing together a range of differing interests.
By Corinna Visser
The European Parliament has adopted its position on the AI Omnibus. Negotiations with the Council and the Commission are now set to begin, bringing together a range of differing interests.
By Corinna Visser
The alternative to deregulation is not just more investment. The quality and structure of legislation should also be examined in order to stimulate competition.
By Ben Brake
Members of the LIBE and IMCO committees want to give the AI Act more time and are proposing significantly longer transition periods for key AI requirements. This is in response to delays in technical standards and is intended to provide companies with planning certainty.
By Corinna Visser
The shadow rapporteurs have agreed to the rapporteurs’ compromise proposal. It will be put to the committees for a vote next week. The plenary session is scheduled to make a decision on March 26.
By Corinna Visser
The shadow rapporteurs for the AI Omnibus in the EU Parliament are seeking to delay the implementation of AI rules. This would give companies more time before the provisions of the AI Act take effect.
By Corinna Visser
The amendments to the AI omnibus reopen old rifts. MEPs disagree on how broadly the high-risk area should be defined, how industrial AI should be handled, when the AI Act should apply and who should control it. A number of conflicts with the Council are already emerging.
By Corinna Visser