Where will we be in six months? We’ll know how European economic experts predict the future later this morning, when the latest economic sentiment indicator from the Mannheim-based Zew institute is released.
The closely watched index will provide major clues into how likely a German economic recovery really is – or whether Germany will tip into a recession and continue to be a drag on the eurozone.
The German index fell last month for the first time in a year, suggesting a worseningoutlook, while the analysts also became less optimistic about the future of the EU economy. The bloc’s GDP increased in the second quarter of 2024 perhaps in spite of Germany, which saw a 0.1 percent monthly GDP decline thanks to weak investment.
The good news from last month’s survey: About half of the experts surveyed still expected the European economy to improve within six months, and few predicted inflation will get worse.
Even as Germany remains the eurozone’s “weak link,” it is still the largest net contributor to the EU budget, paying €17.4 billion more than it receives, as János Allenbach-Ammann reports below.
We can’t predict the future, but we sure hope you have a great day.
The energy companies RWE and Gasunie may have to forgo €40 million in subsidies from the German government for the planned liquefied natural gas terminal in Brunsbüttel. The companies behind the rival project in Stade have taken legal action against the EU Commission before the European Court of Justice (ECJ) and want to have the approval of the subsidies declared null and void. The action was filed on June 18 (Case T-309/24).
The plaintiffs’ accusations are ultimately directed against the German government. “The aid leads to significant distortions of competition on the market for LNG import terminals and on the downstream wholesale gas market,” the court’s summary states. The plaintiff is Hanseatic Energy Hub, which is building the facility in Stade.
Federal participation leads to low prices
In March 2022, the German government announced that it would acquire a half stake in the Brunsbüttel-based operating company German LNG Terminal via KfW. Gasunie and RWE hold the remaining 40 and ten percent respectively. The land-based terminal is set to replace the floating FSRUby2027 at the latest and further secure Germany’s supply of natural gas.
According to the accusation made by Hanseatic Energy Hub – a joint venture of industrial, energy and financial companies – the operators “charged prices that were considerably too low” for the terminal capacity booking contracts. “A normal economic operator would have calculated with significantly higher expected returns and accordingly demanded higher prices from its customers. This would have closed the financing gap and the terminal could have been built without state aid.”
Financing gap would have been easily closed
According to the plaintiffs, a price increase ofjusttwo percent for capacity bookings would have been enough to close the financing gap. In addition, the Commission’s competition authorities had not carried out a formal investigation.
The EU Commission approved a preferential dividend for the private shareholders in July 2023. “The annual return on the project will thus accrue exclusively to the shareholders Gasunie and RWE up to a fixed limit,” wrote the Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy. Over a term of 15 years, this is expected to raise €40 million. The BMWK had apparently deliberately chosen this approach in order to avoid any doubts regarding state aid.
Lawyer sees ‘special aid mechanism’
“The specifics of the special aid mechanism ensure that, in my preliminary assessment, it is definitely a construction that can be approved,” says Speyer-based European law expert Wolfgang Weiß. The complaint does not go into these specifics enough. The expert also considers the plaintiffs’ arguments regarding the “implausible calculation of the amount of aid” to be “not very conclusive”: “The mere fact that a public bank is involved does not in itself constitute aid, at least according to the prevailing opinion.”
It is also questionable whether the operators of the Stade terminal are even entitled to bring an action. “Competitors of aid recipients must meet very high requirements in order to be able to credibly demonstrate that they are personally and directly affected by the decision: To do so, a significant impact on their competitive relationship must be demonstrated,” explains Weiß. What’s more, even if the plaintiffs were successful, the Commission could still approve the aid with an adjusted justification.
Gas expert considers influence on prices unlikely
The energy consultancy Enervis has doubts about the substance of the complaint. The Brunsbüttel operators had already announced the conclusion of contracts at the end of 2022 – with the mineral oil company Conoco Phillips, the chemical company Ineos and RWE Supply & Trading, says consultant Sebastian Triebsch. “Since the aid for the construction of the terminal was not discussed until 2023 and approved by the EU Commission in July 2023, it is currently not apparent that German LNG offered the capacity booking contracts at prices that were not in line with the market and took the aid into account in its calculations.”
The capacity costs generally only account for a marginal share of the total LNG costs, explains the gas expert. The terminal is also too small to expect massive competitive effects on the terminal market or wholesale gas trading. And another factor, which climate protectionists have repeatedly warned about, makes the market power appear small. Triebsch: “Based on the capacity utilization of German terminals and consumption trends, we cannot assume full capacity utilization as things stand today.”
EuGH
Translation missing.Translation missing.
News
Germany contributes less to the EU budget
Germany’s net contribution to the EU budget in 2023 was €17.4 billion. This is a calculation in a new study by the Cologne Institute for Economic Research (IW Köln), which aggregates the various financial flows between the EU and the member states. As the largest EU economy, Germany remains, as expected, the largest net contributor to the EU – ahead of France and Italy.
However, the net amount has shrunk compared to the previous year. In 2022, Germany paid a net amount of €19.7 billion, according to IW Köln. The decline is due to Germany’s weak economy. A large part of the EU budget is financed by member state contributions, which are calculated based on the gross national income (GNI). Due to current economic developments, the authors at IW Köln assume that Germany will contribute even less in net terms in 2024. “There will therefore be a shift in the burden to faster-growing economies such as Spain or Portugal,” they write.
Net contributors benefit more from the single market
The largest net recipients of EU funds are Poland (€8.2 billion), Romania (€6.0 billion) and Hungary (€4.6 billion). The authors of the study warn that the effects of EU integration “cannot be reduced to the net positions of the member states vis-à-vis the EU budget.” Nevertheless, they consider the publication of the figures important, especially as the EU Commission has not published the corresponding net calculations since 2020.
In Brussels, such net calculations tend to be viewed with skepticism, as they disregard the benefits for net contributors, especially for large economies such as Germany. The large EU budget items for cohesion and agricultural policy in particular are part of a political compromise that made the single market possible in the first place. A 2019 study by the Bertelsmann Foundation, for example, calculated that Germany (followed by France, the UK and Italy) would benefit the most economically from the single market. jaa
EU-Haushalt
Greens question stationary border controls
The timing is not particularly sensitive: three weeks before the state elections in Saxony and Thuringia and six weeks before the elections in Brandenburg, Green MEPs are criticizing Germany’s border controls with Poland, the Czech Republic, Austria and Switzerland.
“We are addressing you today with concerns regarding the stationary border controls to Poland, the Czech Republic, Austria and Switzerland introduced by the Federal Ministry of the Interior,” reads the letter from the party’s MEPs, members of the federal and state parliaments to the EU Commission and its President Ursula von der Leyen. The Green MEPs doubt the compatibility of the controls with the Schengen Borders Code. “In addition, a new expert report shows that the intended effect of border controls and related success stories are highly questionable and, in many cases, not statistically proven.”
The letter is signed by MEPs Anna Cavazzini and Erik Marquardt, members of the Bundestag Filiz Polat and Marcel Emmerich and Brandenburg state parliament member Sahra Damus, among others.
Federal Minister of the Interior Nancy Faeser (SPD) ordered the controls at the borders with Poland, the Czech Republic and Switzerland last October and notified the EU Commission. They are currently limited until December 15. Stationary controls have been in place at the land border with Austria since 2015. These controls have been extended several times and will initially remain in place until November 11.
Scholz: important tool in the fight against illegal migration
Despite rising numbers of illegal entries, Faeser had previously rejected this measure several times and instead relied on intensified dragnet controls. The CDU/CSU parliamentary group in the Bundestag and the interior ministers of Brandenburg and Saxony, Armin Schuster and Michael Stübgen (both CDU), had therefore sharply criticized the Federal Minister of the Interior and vehemently called for the introduction of stationary border controls. Faeser then changed her mind, there has been hardly any criticism of the controls since they were introduced.
Federal Chancellor Olaf Scholz has repeatedly emphasized that the controls are an important tool in the fight against illegalmigration. In the resolution of the Conference of Minister Presidents in June, the heads of government of the federal states “welcomed” the reintroduction of controls, which they attest to have reduced irregular migration. The decision was also supported by the Green Minister President of Baden-Württemberg, Winfried Kretschmann, and Vice-Chancellor Robert Habeck was also involved. The Greens, who are actually in favor of flexible controls according to their program, no longer wanted to offer the Union any more points of attack. bub
André Ventura – Portugal’s ultra-right nationalist
In 2019, André Ventura founded the Chega (“Enough is enough”) party. He is supported by powerful business families in the country.
Religion plays a major role in André Ventura’s life. As a teenager, he attended a Catholic seminary. Inflicting pain on himself with a penance belt was part of his spiritual experience. Although he left the seminary to become a lawyer and later a politician, his relationship with politics is still tinged with religion. The leader and founder of the Chega party claims that God has entrusted him with the “task of changing Portugal.” In order to fulfill this task, Ventura believes that nationalist and ultra-right-wing politics are obviously needed.
André Claro Amaral Ventura was born in 1983 in Sintra, a small town in the Lisbon metropolitan area. His family did not have him baptized, he decided to become a Catholic on his own at the age of 14, joined a Christian youth group, began reading religious literature and interpreting the Bible to the letter. When he fell in love, he swapped his life as a clergyman for a career in law. But Ventura says: “I left the seminary, but the seminary didn’t leave me.” He completed his law degree at the Universidade Nova de Lisboa and went on to gain a doctorate in public law at the University of Cork (Ireland).
Soccer, tabloids and politics
Ventura began his political career in the center-right Partido Social Democrata (PSD) party. In the 2017 local elections, he was elected as a councillor for the PSD in the municipality of Loures. In addition to his political career as a councillor, he also made a name for himself as a sports commentator for his soccer club Benfica and as a columnist for the tabloid Correio da Manhã. In his opinion pieces, Ventura spoke out in favor of the chemical castration of pedophiles, for example.
However, his controversial positions on immigration and minorities as well as differences with the PSD led to him leavingtheparty in 2018.
In 2019, Ventura founded the Chega party, which translates as “Enough is enough.” The name is derived from an internal movement that Ventura launched in 2018 to topple the then PSD President Rui Rio (“Chega Rui Rio”). In just five years, Chega has gone from a 1.3 percent share of the vote (2019) tothe third strongest political force with 18percent of the vote in the parliamentary elections in March of this year. In the European elections in June , Chega achieved just under 10 percent of the vote.
The slogan: ‘Clean up Portugal‘
Chega defines itself as a “conservative, liberal and nationalist” party, with the rejection of immigration being one of its most important foundations. Its founding manifesto states: “Chega is a nationalist party because it understands the nation as a community of blood, land, property and destiny that unites people with historical, cultural and linguistic ties.”
Ventura and his party focus their anti-immigration discourse on Roma and Muslims, but spare Brazilians, of whom around 240,000 live in Portugal – the largest group of foreigners in the country. Chega is against social aid measures for minorities and immigrants and demands life imprisonment for rapists and murderers. “The people rule, not the elites who rule us” is the phrase that Ventura has used as a mantra in every campaign and election since founding Chega in April 2019. “Clean up Portugal” (“Limpar Portugal”) was this year’s slogan for the parliamentary elections. The aim was to rid the country of its “corrupt elites.”
However, not all influential Portuguese people incur Ventura’s wrath – he is obviously close to some of them. Chega is supported by members of powerful business families, such as the Mello family, owners of wine companies and the third richest family in Portugal, and the Champalimaud clan, owners of the Oitavos hotels.
Heterogeneous electorate
André Ventura has managed to win the votes of outraged Portuguese, but also of ultra-conservatives and right-wing extremists who have found a political home with him. But not only that. In a report, the daily newspaper “Publico” notes that even former supporters of the communists support the Chega party.
The Chega leader is not bothered by his party being labeled “far-right”. “Today we live in a country where anyone who defends Portuguese people who pay their taxes and don’t live off the system is branded a fascist,” Ventura said in an interview in 2021. That same year, Chega took up the motto of António Salazar’s dictatorship: “God, country, family and work”. “I’m not a Salazarist, and neither is the party, but these are good values to guide society,” Ventura said at the time. isabel cuesta
Where will we be in six months? We’ll know how European economic experts predict the future later this morning, when the latest economic sentiment indicator from the Mannheim-based Zew institute is released.
The closely watched index will provide major clues into how likely a German economic recovery really is – or whether Germany will tip into a recession and continue to be a drag on the eurozone.
The German index fell last month for the first time in a year, suggesting a worseningoutlook, while the analysts also became less optimistic about the future of the EU economy. The bloc’s GDP increased in the second quarter of 2024 perhaps in spite of Germany, which saw a 0.1 percent monthly GDP decline thanks to weak investment.
The good news from last month’s survey: About half of the experts surveyed still expected the European economy to improve within six months, and few predicted inflation will get worse.
Even as Germany remains the eurozone’s “weak link,” it is still the largest net contributor to the EU budget, paying €17.4 billion more than it receives, as János Allenbach-Ammann reports below.
We can’t predict the future, but we sure hope you have a great day.
The energy companies RWE and Gasunie may have to forgo €40 million in subsidies from the German government for the planned liquefied natural gas terminal in Brunsbüttel. The companies behind the rival project in Stade have taken legal action against the EU Commission before the European Court of Justice (ECJ) and want to have the approval of the subsidies declared null and void. The action was filed on June 18 (Case T-309/24).
The plaintiffs’ accusations are ultimately directed against the German government. “The aid leads to significant distortions of competition on the market for LNG import terminals and on the downstream wholesale gas market,” the court’s summary states. The plaintiff is Hanseatic Energy Hub, which is building the facility in Stade.
Federal participation leads to low prices
In March 2022, the German government announced that it would acquire a half stake in the Brunsbüttel-based operating company German LNG Terminal via KfW. Gasunie and RWE hold the remaining 40 and ten percent respectively. The land-based terminal is set to replace the floating FSRUby2027 at the latest and further secure Germany’s supply of natural gas.
According to the accusation made by Hanseatic Energy Hub – a joint venture of industrial, energy and financial companies – the operators “charged prices that were considerably too low” for the terminal capacity booking contracts. “A normal economic operator would have calculated with significantly higher expected returns and accordingly demanded higher prices from its customers. This would have closed the financing gap and the terminal could have been built without state aid.”
Financing gap would have been easily closed
According to the plaintiffs, a price increase ofjusttwo percent for capacity bookings would have been enough to close the financing gap. In addition, the Commission’s competition authorities had not carried out a formal investigation.
The EU Commission approved a preferential dividend for the private shareholders in July 2023. “The annual return on the project will thus accrue exclusively to the shareholders Gasunie and RWE up to a fixed limit,” wrote the Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy. Over a term of 15 years, this is expected to raise €40 million. The BMWK had apparently deliberately chosen this approach in order to avoid any doubts regarding state aid.
Lawyer sees ‘special aid mechanism’
“The specifics of the special aid mechanism ensure that, in my preliminary assessment, it is definitely a construction that can be approved,” says Speyer-based European law expert Wolfgang Weiß. The complaint does not go into these specifics enough. The expert also considers the plaintiffs’ arguments regarding the “implausible calculation of the amount of aid” to be “not very conclusive”: “The mere fact that a public bank is involved does not in itself constitute aid, at least according to the prevailing opinion.”
It is also questionable whether the operators of the Stade terminal are even entitled to bring an action. “Competitors of aid recipients must meet very high requirements in order to be able to credibly demonstrate that they are personally and directly affected by the decision: To do so, a significant impact on their competitive relationship must be demonstrated,” explains Weiß. What’s more, even if the plaintiffs were successful, the Commission could still approve the aid with an adjusted justification.
Gas expert considers influence on prices unlikely
The energy consultancy Enervis has doubts about the substance of the complaint. The Brunsbüttel operators had already announced the conclusion of contracts at the end of 2022 – with the mineral oil company Conoco Phillips, the chemical company Ineos and RWE Supply & Trading, says consultant Sebastian Triebsch. “Since the aid for the construction of the terminal was not discussed until 2023 and approved by the EU Commission in July 2023, it is currently not apparent that German LNG offered the capacity booking contracts at prices that were not in line with the market and took the aid into account in its calculations.”
The capacity costs generally only account for a marginal share of the total LNG costs, explains the gas expert. The terminal is also too small to expect massive competitive effects on the terminal market or wholesale gas trading. And another factor, which climate protectionists have repeatedly warned about, makes the market power appear small. Triebsch: “Based on the capacity utilization of German terminals and consumption trends, we cannot assume full capacity utilization as things stand today.”
EuGH
Translation missing.Translation missing.
News
Germany contributes less to the EU budget
Germany’s net contribution to the EU budget in 2023 was €17.4 billion. This is a calculation in a new study by the Cologne Institute for Economic Research (IW Köln), which aggregates the various financial flows between the EU and the member states. As the largest EU economy, Germany remains, as expected, the largest net contributor to the EU – ahead of France and Italy.
However, the net amount has shrunk compared to the previous year. In 2022, Germany paid a net amount of €19.7 billion, according to IW Köln. The decline is due to Germany’s weak economy. A large part of the EU budget is financed by member state contributions, which are calculated based on the gross national income (GNI). Due to current economic developments, the authors at IW Köln assume that Germany will contribute even less in net terms in 2024. “There will therefore be a shift in the burden to faster-growing economies such as Spain or Portugal,” they write.
Net contributors benefit more from the single market
The largest net recipients of EU funds are Poland (€8.2 billion), Romania (€6.0 billion) and Hungary (€4.6 billion). The authors of the study warn that the effects of EU integration “cannot be reduced to the net positions of the member states vis-à-vis the EU budget.” Nevertheless, they consider the publication of the figures important, especially as the EU Commission has not published the corresponding net calculations since 2020.
In Brussels, such net calculations tend to be viewed with skepticism, as they disregard the benefits for net contributors, especially for large economies such as Germany. The large EU budget items for cohesion and agricultural policy in particular are part of a political compromise that made the single market possible in the first place. A 2019 study by the Bertelsmann Foundation, for example, calculated that Germany (followed by France, the UK and Italy) would benefit the most economically from the single market. jaa
EU-Haushalt
Greens question stationary border controls
The timing is not particularly sensitive: three weeks before the state elections in Saxony and Thuringia and six weeks before the elections in Brandenburg, Green MEPs are criticizing Germany’s border controls with Poland, the Czech Republic, Austria and Switzerland.
“We are addressing you today with concerns regarding the stationary border controls to Poland, the Czech Republic, Austria and Switzerland introduced by the Federal Ministry of the Interior,” reads the letter from the party’s MEPs, members of the federal and state parliaments to the EU Commission and its President Ursula von der Leyen. The Green MEPs doubt the compatibility of the controls with the Schengen Borders Code. “In addition, a new expert report shows that the intended effect of border controls and related success stories are highly questionable and, in many cases, not statistically proven.”
The letter is signed by MEPs Anna Cavazzini and Erik Marquardt, members of the Bundestag Filiz Polat and Marcel Emmerich and Brandenburg state parliament member Sahra Damus, among others.
Federal Minister of the Interior Nancy Faeser (SPD) ordered the controls at the borders with Poland, the Czech Republic and Switzerland last October and notified the EU Commission. They are currently limited until December 15. Stationary controls have been in place at the land border with Austria since 2015. These controls have been extended several times and will initially remain in place until November 11.
Scholz: important tool in the fight against illegal migration
Despite rising numbers of illegal entries, Faeser had previously rejected this measure several times and instead relied on intensified dragnet controls. The CDU/CSU parliamentary group in the Bundestag and the interior ministers of Brandenburg and Saxony, Armin Schuster and Michael Stübgen (both CDU), had therefore sharply criticized the Federal Minister of the Interior and vehemently called for the introduction of stationary border controls. Faeser then changed her mind, there has been hardly any criticism of the controls since they were introduced.
Federal Chancellor Olaf Scholz has repeatedly emphasized that the controls are an important tool in the fight against illegalmigration. In the resolution of the Conference of Minister Presidents in June, the heads of government of the federal states “welcomed” the reintroduction of controls, which they attest to have reduced irregular migration. The decision was also supported by the Green Minister President of Baden-Württemberg, Winfried Kretschmann, and Vice-Chancellor Robert Habeck was also involved. The Greens, who are actually in favor of flexible controls according to their program, no longer wanted to offer the Union any more points of attack. bub
André Ventura – Portugal’s ultra-right nationalist
In 2019, André Ventura founded the Chega (“Enough is enough”) party. He is supported by powerful business families in the country.
Religion plays a major role in André Ventura’s life. As a teenager, he attended a Catholic seminary. Inflicting pain on himself with a penance belt was part of his spiritual experience. Although he left the seminary to become a lawyer and later a politician, his relationship with politics is still tinged with religion. The leader and founder of the Chega party claims that God has entrusted him with the “task of changing Portugal.” In order to fulfill this task, Ventura believes that nationalist and ultra-right-wing politics are obviously needed.
André Claro Amaral Ventura was born in 1983 in Sintra, a small town in the Lisbon metropolitan area. His family did not have him baptized, he decided to become a Catholic on his own at the age of 14, joined a Christian youth group, began reading religious literature and interpreting the Bible to the letter. When he fell in love, he swapped his life as a clergyman for a career in law. But Ventura says: “I left the seminary, but the seminary didn’t leave me.” He completed his law degree at the Universidade Nova de Lisboa and went on to gain a doctorate in public law at the University of Cork (Ireland).
Soccer, tabloids and politics
Ventura began his political career in the center-right Partido Social Democrata (PSD) party. In the 2017 local elections, he was elected as a councillor for the PSD in the municipality of Loures. In addition to his political career as a councillor, he also made a name for himself as a sports commentator for his soccer club Benfica and as a columnist for the tabloid Correio da Manhã. In his opinion pieces, Ventura spoke out in favor of the chemical castration of pedophiles, for example.
However, his controversial positions on immigration and minorities as well as differences with the PSD led to him leavingtheparty in 2018.
In 2019, Ventura founded the Chega party, which translates as “Enough is enough.” The name is derived from an internal movement that Ventura launched in 2018 to topple the then PSD President Rui Rio (“Chega Rui Rio”). In just five years, Chega has gone from a 1.3 percent share of the vote (2019) tothe third strongest political force with 18percent of the vote in the parliamentary elections in March of this year. In the European elections in June , Chega achieved just under 10 percent of the vote.
The slogan: ‘Clean up Portugal‘
Chega defines itself as a “conservative, liberal and nationalist” party, with the rejection of immigration being one of its most important foundations. Its founding manifesto states: “Chega is a nationalist party because it understands the nation as a community of blood, land, property and destiny that unites people with historical, cultural and linguistic ties.”
Ventura and his party focus their anti-immigration discourse on Roma and Muslims, but spare Brazilians, of whom around 240,000 live in Portugal – the largest group of foreigners in the country. Chega is against social aid measures for minorities and immigrants and demands life imprisonment for rapists and murderers. “The people rule, not the elites who rule us” is the phrase that Ventura has used as a mantra in every campaign and election since founding Chega in April 2019. “Clean up Portugal” (“Limpar Portugal”) was this year’s slogan for the parliamentary elections. The aim was to rid the country of its “corrupt elites.”
However, not all influential Portuguese people incur Ventura’s wrath – he is obviously close to some of them. Chega is supported by members of powerful business families, such as the Mello family, owners of wine companies and the third richest family in Portugal, and the Champalimaud clan, owners of the Oitavos hotels.
Heterogeneous electorate
André Ventura has managed to win the votes of outraged Portuguese, but also of ultra-conservatives and right-wing extremists who have found a political home with him. But not only that. In a report, the daily newspaper “Publico” notes that even former supporters of the communists support the Chega party.
The Chega leader is not bothered by his party being labeled “far-right”. “Today we live in a country where anyone who defends Portuguese people who pay their taxes and don’t live off the system is branded a fascist,” Ventura said in an interview in 2021. That same year, Chega took up the motto of António Salazar’s dictatorship: “God, country, family and work”. “I’m not a Salazarist, and neither is the party, but these are good values to guide society,” Ventura said at the time. isabel cuesta