Volodymyr Zelenskiy visited Brussels on Thursday and the verbal solidarity was immense. “We are one family; family members help each other,” Ursula von der Leyen stressed. EU Council President Charles Michel promised the guest from Kyiv “maximum support”. However, this solidarity has not yet come in particularly concrete terms, as Stephan Israel analyzes.
Many people still pour money down the drain heating their homes because their house or apartment is poorly insulated. And this is likely to remain the case for some time to come. On Thursday, the Industry Committee voted in favor of numerous exemptions to the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD). About a quarter of the affected buildings is supposed to be exempt from the renovation obligation, as Manuel Berkel reports.
The Greens, in particular, are very strict when it comes to lobbying. But this week, such accusations against Green MEP Jutta Paulus have come to light. Now EPP members call for consequences: Paulus should withdraw as rapporteur for the EU legislative project to reduce methane emissions in the energy sector, EPP politicians demand.
It is rare for a guest to be so eagerly expected in Brussels that the European Quarter rolls out the red carpet and receives them with great fanfare. But when Volodymyr Zelenskiy made his appearance before the EU Parliament and later at the EU summit, it was clear that he was meant to feel right at home. There were ovations, cheering and the Ukrainian national anthem. “You have inspired not only your country but the whole world with your resistance,” Parliament Speaker Roberta Metsola greeted the guest. She said that Ukraine will win against Russia’s “brutal and illegal invasion”.
The Ukrainian president had arrived at Brussels Airport from Paris that morning with French President Emmanuel Macron, where he was received by EU Council President Charles Michel, EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and Belgian Prime Minister Alexander De Croo. The only other person to receive such an honor is a US president.
Zelenskiy is Europe’s war president, the man from the front. This was already made clear by his clothing. Alongside the suits, the Ukrainian president clearly stood out in brown pants, sturdy shoes and a black sweater. Volodymyr Zelenskiy also proved in Brussels that he is a good speaker. He had a tailor-made message for each audience. He praised the British government for the early as well as determined support and, at the same time, demanded fighter planes and long-range missiles.
In Paris, he met Europe’s more reluctant tandem, Emmanuel Macron and Olaf Scholz, for a late dinner. Not much leaked from the late-night conversation. According to diplomats, the visitor from the war zone made it clear that the situation on the front was critical.
Speaking before the EU Parliament, Volodymyr Zelenskiy addressed the whole of Europe. Vladimir Putin’s war against Ukraine is an attack against the “European way of life“. The Russian regime hates everything that Europe stands for, namely democracy, the rule of law, the social model and diversity. Only a Ukrainian victory would ensure that Europe’s values would prevail in the historic struggle against “anti-European forces”. The fate of Ukraine and the EU are linked, the message goes.
Almost at the same time, a few hundred meters away in the Europe Building, EU leaders arrived for the special summit. “We are here to send a signal of solidarity and support for Ukraine,” Chancellor Olaf Scholz said upon arrival.
Emmanuel Macron feels pressure to do more almost a year after the Russian attack on Ukraine began. He pointed to the difficult situation on the front lines, saying, “We see that the next weeks and months are crucial.” The West, he said, must send weapons that are useful now, not make promises that can only be fulfilled in the distant future. And in general, he said, the next deliveries will not be discussed publicly. The question of fighter jets for Ukraine “does not arise that way,” France’s president said.
Volodymyr Zelenskiy insisted that the member states give the green light for the start of accession negotiations by the end of the year. This was important for the motivation of the Ukrainians. EU Council President Charles Michel promised the guest “maximum support”. The EU will stand by Ukraine until it is a club member. In some capitals, however, the date is considered very unrealistic.
Ursula von der Leyen did not want to be left behind. The EU will do everything to ensure that Ukraine wins this war and that a just peace settlement is reached, said the Commission President. Russia must pay for the destruction and for the blood spilled. The EU Commission wants to be ready as soon as reconstruction can begin. Clarifying where alleged war criminals should be tried and the extent to which blocked foreign currency from Russia’s central bank can be used for reconstruction is a priority.
Von der Leyen also wants to press ahead with the tenth sanctions package, which has been in the works for some time. Talks with the member states are planned for the weekend. It is intended to hit further Russian exports to the tune of €10 billion. In addition, loopholes in the existing sanctions regime are supposed to be closed. The punitive measures against Belarus and Russia are supposed to be synchronized, an EU diplomat said. The Commission President also mentioned further sanctions against Russian propaganda.
He did not have the right to go home without results, Zelenskiy urged. In London, he said, the talks on combat aircraft and long-range missiles had been “positive”. Certain agreements, however, were not public, he said. Zelenskiy described the meeting with Scholz and Macron in Paris as “powerful” and important. The impression was also positive, he said, but he did not want to go into details.
He said he came to Brussels primarily to say thank you. “We have received positive signals that we will get the necessary weapons,” Zelenskiy said in the evening. Discussions are underway to form an alliance for combat aircraft similar to the one for battle tanks, a diplomat said. In addition to F-15 aircraft, Ukraine could also get Soviet-made Mig-29s from individual Eastern European member states.
In response to the US Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), the EU focuses on a targeted relaxation of state aid rules for climate-friendly technologies. The procedures for state aid should become “simpler, faster and more predictable,” according to the EU summit’s final declaration. Subsidies and tax breaks for green industries should be “targeted, temporary and proportionate,” it said. This should prevent distortion of competition and safeguard the internal market.
There are also plans to use money from existing EU pots more flexibly to support companies. The German government had pressed for this. In addition, the EU states want to do more to combat the shortage of skilled workers – for example, through training and continuing education. Access to important raw materials is also emphasized.
The summit thus largely follows proposals from the Commission. The Commission’s President Ursula von der Leyen announced that legislative proposals would be drawn up by mid-March for discussion at the next EU summit on March 23 and 24. In the run-up to the summit, a number of member states had warned that a far-reaching relaxation of state aid rules would distort competition in the single market in favor of financially strong states such as Germany. This warning is also reflected in the final declaration.
It is unclear whether new EU funding will also be made available. The final declaration merely states that “a fully effective EU policy response requires fair access to financial resources.” To that end, “existing EU funds should be used more flexibly and options to facilitate access to finance should be explored.” The leaders also noted the Commission’s intention to present a European sovereignty fund in the summer. They also called on the Commission to quickly present its reform proposals for the Stability and Growth Pact.
France, Italy and Spain, in particular, have advocated such a debt-financed fund. Support is now coming from the United States: US Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen is advising the EU to introduce its own subsidy program. “If Europe takes action to introduce subsidies similar to ours, that’s good climate policy,” Yellen said. “We have the same goals, Europe and the United States.” Earlier, US President Joe Biden made it clear that the United States would no longer unravel the IRA. In addition, Washington insists it has preemption on critical supply chains.
“The supply chain starts in America,” Biden said in his State of the Union address on Tuesday. During a visit to Washington, German Economy Minister Robert Habeck had tried to persuade the US to make concessions. The results of his trip are now to be incorporated into the Commission’s proposal. With Till Hoppe
Rarely has the need for rapid and ambitious retrofits been greater than in the current energy crisis. “A gradual increase in building renovations from less than one to four percent per year and a prioritization on poorly insulated and gas-heated buildings would save 14 percent of gas demand for heating annually by 2025,” DIW energy expert Karsten Neuhoff said this week, calling for the recommendations of the German government’s Expert Commission on Gas and Heat to be fully implemented.
For the time after that, the ITRE position on the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD) adopted on Thursday does not suggest any particularly ambitious targets for the buildings sector. At the heart of the reform are minimum energy performance standards (MEPS). This is intended to ensure that the most wasteful buildings meet certain minimum standards from certain dates. These include:
That’s too little for an alliance of environmental and industry groups. “While the minimum targets provision is slightly more ambitious than the Commission’s proposal, the report introduces an exemption that would result in nearly a quarter of the most inefficient residential buildings remaining unrenovated by 2037,” said Arianna Vitali, secretary general at the Coalition for Energy Savings.
Member states can exempt publicly owned social housing from renovation requirements to prevent rent increases and save on subsidies. With the Commission’s approval, national governments will also be allowed to claim a shortage of skilled workers and a lack of economic viability – for a total of 22 percent of the housing stock. Further relief will apply, among other things, to listed buildings.
On the other hand, the exceptions do not yet go far enough for CSU member of parliament Angelika Niebler: “Social housing in Germany is partly privately owned and thus cannot benefit from the exception, for example.”
Parliament goes somewhat further than the Commission with regard to new buildings and the solar roof obligation. From 2028, new buildings may no longer cause emissions and must be equipped with solar systems where technically and economically feasible. For renovations, the solar obligation is to take effect from 2032.
Environmental Action Germany (DUH) nevertheless considers the deal unsuitable “for setting the necessary framework conditions for a socially just and climate target-compatible transformation of the building sector”. DUH had previously pointed to a loophole for phasing out fossil-fuel heating.
Once the directive comes into force, gas or oil-fired boilers should no longer be allowed to be installed, and from 2035 – or with the approval of the Commission in 2040 – they should disappear completely. But the certification of boilers for renewable energies alone is supposed to be enough to keep them running. Since any gas heating system can run on biomethane, this provision alone could undermine the ban, fears Elisabeth Staudt of DUH.
“Then the MEPs’ proposal also stipulates that any heating system that runs on one percent renewables and 99 percent fossil fuels can be classified as ‘renewable,’” criticizes Jozefien Vanbecelaere of the heat pump association EHPA.
BDEW, on the other hand, draws attention to possible conflicts with another regulation: “It is not expedient that the MEPs want to enable the member states to set individual requirements for gas-based technology options in the future. The ecodesign framework, intended to prevent national market barriers, actually applies to energy requirements for heat generators in the EU internal market.”
However, the Buildings Directive is to be significantly expanded to include the issue of adaptation to climate change. MEPs have tightened up the Commission’s proposals: Member states are to ensure that new buildings are adapted to changes in the climate when they come into force. As an example, the ITRE agreement now explicitly mentions green infrastructure, such as green roofs and walls.
The skilled trades dread the new requirements. “Other topics will be added to the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive,” criticizes Holger Schwannecke, Secretary General of the German Confederation of Skilled Crafts (ZDH). “The adopted draft report gives rise to fears that energy-related renovation and construction will become considerably more complex and expensive.”
The vote in the plenary session of the Parliament is scheduled for mid-March. The Council decided on its general approach months ago. However, a spokesperson for the Swedish Council Presidency explained yesterday that there is no date yet for a first trilogue.
Feb. 13, 2023; 3 p.m.
Euro Group
Topics: Recent developments in energy markets and their impact on the fiscal policy response in the euro area, Thematic discussion – Euro area labor markets: recent developments and challenges ahead, macroeconomic and financial developments and policy coordination in the euro area. Draft Agenda
Feb. 13, 2023; 5-10 p.m.
Plenary session of the EU Parliament: REPowerEU, electoral rights
Topics: Debate on the REPowerEU chapters in recovery and resilience plans, debate on the electoral rights of mobile Union citizens in municipal elections. Draft Agenda
Feb. 14, 2023
Weekly Commission meeting
Topics: Review of the CO2 emission standards for heavy-duty vehicles. Draft Agenda
Feb. 14, 2023; 9 a.m.-10 p.m.
Plenary session of the EU Parliament: CO2 emission standards, Market Stability Reserve, foreign affairs issues
Topics: Debate on CO2 emission standards for cars and vans, vote on the revision of the Market Stability Reserve for the EU Emissions Trading System, debate on foreign affairs issues in the presence of the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy. Draft Agenda
Feb. 14, 2023; 10 a.m.
EU Council: economic and financial affairs
Topics: Exchange of views on the economic and financial impact of Russia’s aggression against Ukraine, adoption of the council implementing decisions under the Recovery and Resilience Facility, Preparation of the G20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors meeting of 24-25 February 2023 – G20 EU terms of reference. Draft Agenda
Feb. 15, 2023; 9 a.m.-10 p.m.
Plenary session of the EU Parliament: Horizon Europe, Central Bank, critical raw materials
Topics: Vote on the joint undertakings under Horizon Europe (Chips Joint Undertaking), debate on the annual report of the European Central Bank 2022, debate on the access to strategic critical raw materials. Draft Agenda
Feb. 16, 2023
ECJ ruling: suspension of enforcement of a European Enforcement Order
Topics: Lufthansa Technik AERO Alzey has obtained a European Enforcement Order against Arik Air before the German courts in relation to a claim of over €2 million euros. Based on this enforcement order, an aircraft belonging to Arik Air was seized in Lithuania. Lufthansa is defending itself before the Lithuanian Supreme Court against the suspension of the enforcement proceedings. This court would like to know from the Court of Justice, among other things, when “exceptional circumstances” exist that can justify a court in the executing State ordering a stay of execution. Schlussanträge
Feb. 16, 2023; 9 a.m.-4 p.m.
Plenary session of the EU Parliament: fertilizers, interpellations
Topics: Debate on the Commission communication on ensuring availability and affordability of fertilizers, debate on major interpellations. Draft Agenda
Feb. 17-19, 2023
Munich Security Conference
Topics: For three days, the Munich Security Conference provides a platform for high-level debates on the greatest foreign and security policy challenges of our time. Infos
The EPP demands the resignation of Jutta Paulus (Greens) as rapporteur for the EU legislative project “Reducing methane emissions in the energy sector”. In a mail to the Green MEP from Giessen, the head of the responsible environment committee, Pascal Canfin (Renew) and others, Christian Ehler (CDU), coordinator in the committee and EPP shadow rapporteur Massimiliano Salini wrote last night: “We have serious doubts about the integrity of the rapporteur.”
Table.Media had reported that the document with the incorporated compromise proposals for their report was not created on a computer in the EP, but on the computer of a lobbyist. Paulus had admitted this but explained that she had only used the formatting template.
Referring to a quote from transparency expert Nina Katzemich of Lobbycontrol in the Table.Media article, the two Christian Democrats go on to write, “Surely you and every single member of the Green Group agree that it is unacceptable for lobbyists to be ‘wielding the pen’ at the very moment when the EP rapporteur is putting together the compromise proposals.” It goes on to say with regard to the Kaili corruption scandal, “Combined with the recent revelations about the alleged influence of third countries on the European Parliament, this affair additionally casts a bad light on our institution.” mgr
No more Russian natural gas has been flowing into the EU via the Nord Stream pipeline in the Baltic Sea and the Yamal pipeline through Poland for months. However, the remaining Ukraine Transit and Turkstream pipelines also become less and less important for the EU’s gas supply. As an evaluation by the Brussels-based think tank Bruegel shows, less than eight percent of the gas imported into the EU flowed through these pipelines in the first five weeks of this year. At the beginning of 2021, the share had still been over 48 percent. The absolute volume of imported Russian pipeline gas has thus fallen by 86 percent within two years.
This could also have an impact on the planned LNG terminals in Germany. Economy Minister Robert Habeck had recently stated that southeastern European countries would also have to be supplied via these if the gas supply from Russia were to be stopped completely. In fact, the latest figures show that the gap is not particularly large. Mathematically, the remaining Russian gas could currently be closed with the existing infrastructure.
Nevertheless, Bruegel believes that the construction of the floating terminals makes sense. This is because they would ensure that there are still reserves even if no gas flows from Russia and the next winters are very cold. If all the planned terminals are also built on land, however, there is a risk of significant overcapacity throughout Europe from 2025, the think tank warns. This is true even in the case of a capacity utilization of only 65 percent.
If each government worked toward its own security of supply, “the EU as a whole would risk building substantial gas overcapacity,” the think tank had warned last year. “This would be an inefficient use of resources and would strengthen interest groups that oppose a rapid gas phase-out,” they said at the time. mkr
Yesterday, the Parliament’s Industry Committee voted against the Green and Renew motion to create an independent association for the future hydrogen networks (ENNOH). Instead, a majority adopted the compromise on the gas market regulation, led by rapporteur Jerzy Buzek (EPP), according to which ENTSOG should be developed into a joint organization of European network operators for natural gas and hydrogen (ENTSOG&H).
“The transfer of hydrogen infrastructure planning to gas grid operators jeopardizes clear guidance on where hydrogen grids make sense and where gas grids need to be dismantled,” said Esther Bollendorff of the Climate Action Network (CAN), commenting on the decision. This poses the risk of an excessive expansion of hydrogen networks and a lock-in of fossil infrastructure.
In addition to the position on the regulation, ITRE yesterday also adopted the compromise of rapporteur Jens Geier (SPD) on the gas market directive.
The position adopted suits the gas distribution system operators. “We expressly welcome the fact that the Parliament has spoken out against corporate unbundling and in favor of the distinction between transmission and distribution network levels. This is a clear signal that the members of parliament recognize the important role of the existing gas network for the energy and heat transition,” said Ingbert Liebing, Chief Executive Officer of the German Association of Local Utilities (VKU). However, the Council currently takes a different position on this issue than the Parliament. ber
The MEPs in the Industry Committee (ITRE) adopted the compromise proposals on the European digital identity (eID) and the Data Act on Thursday with a clear majority. The eID is intended to give EU citizens secure access to public and private digital services – even across national borders. And they are to be able to identify themselves electronically throughout Europe via a wallet app.
In its proposal, the Commission had envisaged a mandatory lifetime personal identification number for every EU citizen. However, the parliamentarians rejected this. Its use should be limited to cross-border administrative services. The criticism was that, in this way, the state could combine information from numerous areas of life and thus create transparent citizens. However, the parliamentarians will have to continue this discussion because the Council has endorsed the Commission’s proposal on this point.
The eID is a decisive step forward, tweeted shadow rapporteur Alin Mituța (Renew) after the vote. He said it would allow EU citizens and businesses to “retain full control over their data and documents.” Angelika Niebler (CSU) stressed that “citizens can use the European digital identity card voluntarily and it is not mandatory.” Patrick Breyer (Pirates) warned, “We have to stand up to the great risk that the planned ‘digital identity’ could gradually displace the anonymity on the Internet that protects us from profiling and identity theft.”
Criticism came from the business community: Jan Oetjen, CEO of the Internet service providers Web.de and GMX, believes it is a design flaw that the planned wallet requires identification with an ID card right at the start. Unlike the Apple and Google wallets, for example, this creates a high hurdle. This will paralyze the intended spread of a Europe-wide ID standard. The EU would also miss the opportunity to establish a competitive alternative to the systems of the US platforms. The wallet must be compatible with mass use cases such as e-mail, messenger or social networks, said Oetjen.
Kim Nguyen, CEO of the trust services provider D-Trust, which is part of Bundesdruckerei (Federal Press), on the other hand, praised the fact that Parliament had “fortunately once again strengthened” citizens’ control options for the wallet. This is “an important basis for the broadest possible acceptance of the wallet“.
As the Council has also already completed its internal work on the eID Regulation and adopted a general approach in December 2022, the way to the trilogue is clear. The process can begin after the vote in plenary – probably in mid-March. For the Data Act, it will take a little longer, as the Council’s general approach is still pending. vis
Yesterday, the Committee on Environment voted on its opinion on the Due Diligence Act. The members of parliament were able to agree on stronger climate requirements. They demand, for example, that companies set themselves climate neutrality targets and be liable for climate damage in their value chains.
“The Environment Committee is sending a strong signal: we want to oblige companies to make their entire value chain climate neutral by 2050,” said rapporteur Tiemo Wölken (SPD). The vote came without the support of the EPP. The latter had withdrawn its support for the compromise text.
The statement also advocates a risk-based approach and calls for companies with 250 or more employees and global sales of €40 million to be covered by the law. Overall, the demands of the Environment Committee are closely aligned with the EU Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), for example, in the definition of adverse environmental impacts. In March, the lead JURI committee votes, and in May the text goes to the plenum. cw
The governor of the autonomous province of Xinjiang, Erkin Tuniyaz, is traveling to London next Sunday on behalf of the Chinese government, where he is expected to meet with representatives of the British Foreign Office. Exactly one week later, Tuniyaz then wants to make an appearance in Brussels to launch a diplomatic charm offensive with the EU member states.
Tuniyaz has been sanctioned by the United States for two years for his role in the human rights violations against Uyghur Muslims in Xinjiang. The US government even refers to Beijing’s treatment of the Uyghurs as genocide. The EU, on the other hand, has so far limited sanctions to four lower-ranking Xinjiang officials, while Tuniyaz is still allowed to enter.
“The governor of Xinjiang is partly responsible for the human rights crimes that the Chinese leadership is still committing in the autonomous region,” MEP Reinhard Buetikofer (Greens) told China.Table. “talks with China must continue. But that excludes people who, like Erkin Tuniyaz, are personally so closely involved in these crimes.”
Criticism also came from the German parliament. “I think this visit is extremely problematic. Offering the governor of Xinjiang a platform would send the wrong signal,” said human rights politician Peter Heidt (FDP). Heidt also believes that Beijing wants to downplay the situation in Xinjiang.
Frank Schwabe (SPD) warns that the Chinese side could exploit the visit for propaganda purposes. “I hope that the Europeans will take a well-prepared, unambiguous communication strategy with them into these talks. Nobody can make the mistake of being misled by the Chinese narrative.” grz
China’s Ambassador to the EU, Fu Cong, warned Brussels against signing a bilateral investment treaty with Taiwan. This would “fundamentally change” EU-China relations and “shake the foundations”. This step will be taken very seriously if it comes to that, Fu said at an event of the European Policy Centre. Fu also criticized visits to Taiwan by EU MPs “and also high-ranking officials from the EU institutions”. So far, several delegations from the European Parliament visited Taipei. However, high-ranking officials from the EU Commission or the European External Action Service (EEAS) have not officially visited Taiwan so far.
Fu rejected comparisons between the Russian invasion of Ukraine and the situation in Taiwan, calling them “two completely different things”. “Ukraine is an independent state, and Taiwan is part of China,” he said, “So there’s no comparability between the two issues.” The Chinese EU ambassador also reiterated Beijing’s position that the war in Ukraine must be resolved through negotiations. “We don’t believe that providing weapons will actually solve the problem.”
China’s EU ambassador also criticized the narrative of a victory for Ukraine. “We are quite concerned about people talking about winning and ‘complete victory’ on the battlefield,” Fu said. He urged to take the “security concerns of both sides” into account. On Thursday, Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelenskiy visited Brussels. Zelenskiy previously met French President Emmanuel Macron and German Chancellor Olaf Scholz in Paris and traveled to London. ari
Few moments shaped David Wortmann’s career as much as his meeting with Arnold Schwarzenegger in 2004. At the time, Wortmann was a research assistant to Hermann Scheer, an SPD member of the Bundestag. Among other things, the team was working on the German Renewable Energy Sources Act (EEG). Then he received an invitation from the man who once played Terminator and had since become governor of California.
Even then, smoking was prohibited in public buildings in the US, so the ex-actor invited us outside: “He received us in a tent in the courtyard of the building. Made up as if we were on a film set and smoking a cigar,” says Wortmann. It didn’t stop there. “Schwarzenegger asked smart questions and let us advise him. This led to a very ambitious climate program in California,” says Wortmann. “That’s when I realized that good work can have an international impact.” For Wortmann, that was a key moment – and the start of a career ripe for change.
Today, Wortmann works as a mediator between business and politics and is very well connected in Berlin and Brussels. He regularly speaks with representatives of governments, ministries, the EU Commission or the Council of Europe. He turned this into a business model back in 2012 and founded the strategy consultancy DWR eco with Doreen Rietentiet. This advises and supports companies and institutions in the green transformation.
In his podcasts “Let’s Talk Change” and “Deep Dive Clean Tech”, he talks with protagonists from business, politics, science and the media about the sustainable transformation of the economy. In “Pod steh uns bei” (“The podcast (Lord) help us”), he regularly assesses the climate policy issues of the week in various host constellations, including together with Luisa Neubauer. He is an entrepreneur, networker and political advisor in one.
Considering his roots, today’s orientation fits all too well. Born in Herdecke, North Rhine-Westphalia, in 1976, Wortmann grew up in the countryside: “During my childhood, I spent a lot of time in the forests and meadows of my rural surroundings,” says Wortmann. “It was a bit of Bullerby: streams, meadows, snow, ponies. We lived on a single remnant farm in Hagen, at the transition from the Ruhr to the Sauerland.”
He later specialized in sustainability and founded the Sustainable Development Forum at the University of Passau while studying economics and political science. Since then, he has been switching back and forth between economics and politics.
As a student assistant, he worked for the Green Party’s Hans-Josef Fell in the Bundestag, then as a research assistant for Hermann Scheer. In 2005, he moved to the start-up First Solar, which is working to lower the cost of solar energy. Then it was back to the government environment: At the German government’s economic development agency, he headed the energy and environment department, lived for a time in Asia, among other places, and brought investors to Germany from around the world.
Even though Wortmann is politically active, he is not currently seeking a direct mandate and thus a move into politics. “I feel comfortable in both worlds, but I can currently make more of a difference in business,” Wortmann says. “I always go where I feel I can make a difference” – and currently that is the position between business and politics. Pascal Mühle
Volodymyr Zelenskiy visited Brussels on Thursday and the verbal solidarity was immense. “We are one family; family members help each other,” Ursula von der Leyen stressed. EU Council President Charles Michel promised the guest from Kyiv “maximum support”. However, this solidarity has not yet come in particularly concrete terms, as Stephan Israel analyzes.
Many people still pour money down the drain heating their homes because their house or apartment is poorly insulated. And this is likely to remain the case for some time to come. On Thursday, the Industry Committee voted in favor of numerous exemptions to the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD). About a quarter of the affected buildings is supposed to be exempt from the renovation obligation, as Manuel Berkel reports.
The Greens, in particular, are very strict when it comes to lobbying. But this week, such accusations against Green MEP Jutta Paulus have come to light. Now EPP members call for consequences: Paulus should withdraw as rapporteur for the EU legislative project to reduce methane emissions in the energy sector, EPP politicians demand.
It is rare for a guest to be so eagerly expected in Brussels that the European Quarter rolls out the red carpet and receives them with great fanfare. But when Volodymyr Zelenskiy made his appearance before the EU Parliament and later at the EU summit, it was clear that he was meant to feel right at home. There were ovations, cheering and the Ukrainian national anthem. “You have inspired not only your country but the whole world with your resistance,” Parliament Speaker Roberta Metsola greeted the guest. She said that Ukraine will win against Russia’s “brutal and illegal invasion”.
The Ukrainian president had arrived at Brussels Airport from Paris that morning with French President Emmanuel Macron, where he was received by EU Council President Charles Michel, EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and Belgian Prime Minister Alexander De Croo. The only other person to receive such an honor is a US president.
Zelenskiy is Europe’s war president, the man from the front. This was already made clear by his clothing. Alongside the suits, the Ukrainian president clearly stood out in brown pants, sturdy shoes and a black sweater. Volodymyr Zelenskiy also proved in Brussels that he is a good speaker. He had a tailor-made message for each audience. He praised the British government for the early as well as determined support and, at the same time, demanded fighter planes and long-range missiles.
In Paris, he met Europe’s more reluctant tandem, Emmanuel Macron and Olaf Scholz, for a late dinner. Not much leaked from the late-night conversation. According to diplomats, the visitor from the war zone made it clear that the situation on the front was critical.
Speaking before the EU Parliament, Volodymyr Zelenskiy addressed the whole of Europe. Vladimir Putin’s war against Ukraine is an attack against the “European way of life“. The Russian regime hates everything that Europe stands for, namely democracy, the rule of law, the social model and diversity. Only a Ukrainian victory would ensure that Europe’s values would prevail in the historic struggle against “anti-European forces”. The fate of Ukraine and the EU are linked, the message goes.
Almost at the same time, a few hundred meters away in the Europe Building, EU leaders arrived for the special summit. “We are here to send a signal of solidarity and support for Ukraine,” Chancellor Olaf Scholz said upon arrival.
Emmanuel Macron feels pressure to do more almost a year after the Russian attack on Ukraine began. He pointed to the difficult situation on the front lines, saying, “We see that the next weeks and months are crucial.” The West, he said, must send weapons that are useful now, not make promises that can only be fulfilled in the distant future. And in general, he said, the next deliveries will not be discussed publicly. The question of fighter jets for Ukraine “does not arise that way,” France’s president said.
Volodymyr Zelenskiy insisted that the member states give the green light for the start of accession negotiations by the end of the year. This was important for the motivation of the Ukrainians. EU Council President Charles Michel promised the guest “maximum support”. The EU will stand by Ukraine until it is a club member. In some capitals, however, the date is considered very unrealistic.
Ursula von der Leyen did not want to be left behind. The EU will do everything to ensure that Ukraine wins this war and that a just peace settlement is reached, said the Commission President. Russia must pay for the destruction and for the blood spilled. The EU Commission wants to be ready as soon as reconstruction can begin. Clarifying where alleged war criminals should be tried and the extent to which blocked foreign currency from Russia’s central bank can be used for reconstruction is a priority.
Von der Leyen also wants to press ahead with the tenth sanctions package, which has been in the works for some time. Talks with the member states are planned for the weekend. It is intended to hit further Russian exports to the tune of €10 billion. In addition, loopholes in the existing sanctions regime are supposed to be closed. The punitive measures against Belarus and Russia are supposed to be synchronized, an EU diplomat said. The Commission President also mentioned further sanctions against Russian propaganda.
He did not have the right to go home without results, Zelenskiy urged. In London, he said, the talks on combat aircraft and long-range missiles had been “positive”. Certain agreements, however, were not public, he said. Zelenskiy described the meeting with Scholz and Macron in Paris as “powerful” and important. The impression was also positive, he said, but he did not want to go into details.
He said he came to Brussels primarily to say thank you. “We have received positive signals that we will get the necessary weapons,” Zelenskiy said in the evening. Discussions are underway to form an alliance for combat aircraft similar to the one for battle tanks, a diplomat said. In addition to F-15 aircraft, Ukraine could also get Soviet-made Mig-29s from individual Eastern European member states.
In response to the US Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), the EU focuses on a targeted relaxation of state aid rules for climate-friendly technologies. The procedures for state aid should become “simpler, faster and more predictable,” according to the EU summit’s final declaration. Subsidies and tax breaks for green industries should be “targeted, temporary and proportionate,” it said. This should prevent distortion of competition and safeguard the internal market.
There are also plans to use money from existing EU pots more flexibly to support companies. The German government had pressed for this. In addition, the EU states want to do more to combat the shortage of skilled workers – for example, through training and continuing education. Access to important raw materials is also emphasized.
The summit thus largely follows proposals from the Commission. The Commission’s President Ursula von der Leyen announced that legislative proposals would be drawn up by mid-March for discussion at the next EU summit on March 23 and 24. In the run-up to the summit, a number of member states had warned that a far-reaching relaxation of state aid rules would distort competition in the single market in favor of financially strong states such as Germany. This warning is also reflected in the final declaration.
It is unclear whether new EU funding will also be made available. The final declaration merely states that “a fully effective EU policy response requires fair access to financial resources.” To that end, “existing EU funds should be used more flexibly and options to facilitate access to finance should be explored.” The leaders also noted the Commission’s intention to present a European sovereignty fund in the summer. They also called on the Commission to quickly present its reform proposals for the Stability and Growth Pact.
France, Italy and Spain, in particular, have advocated such a debt-financed fund. Support is now coming from the United States: US Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen is advising the EU to introduce its own subsidy program. “If Europe takes action to introduce subsidies similar to ours, that’s good climate policy,” Yellen said. “We have the same goals, Europe and the United States.” Earlier, US President Joe Biden made it clear that the United States would no longer unravel the IRA. In addition, Washington insists it has preemption on critical supply chains.
“The supply chain starts in America,” Biden said in his State of the Union address on Tuesday. During a visit to Washington, German Economy Minister Robert Habeck had tried to persuade the US to make concessions. The results of his trip are now to be incorporated into the Commission’s proposal. With Till Hoppe
Rarely has the need for rapid and ambitious retrofits been greater than in the current energy crisis. “A gradual increase in building renovations from less than one to four percent per year and a prioritization on poorly insulated and gas-heated buildings would save 14 percent of gas demand for heating annually by 2025,” DIW energy expert Karsten Neuhoff said this week, calling for the recommendations of the German government’s Expert Commission on Gas and Heat to be fully implemented.
For the time after that, the ITRE position on the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD) adopted on Thursday does not suggest any particularly ambitious targets for the buildings sector. At the heart of the reform are minimum energy performance standards (MEPS). This is intended to ensure that the most wasteful buildings meet certain minimum standards from certain dates. These include:
That’s too little for an alliance of environmental and industry groups. “While the minimum targets provision is slightly more ambitious than the Commission’s proposal, the report introduces an exemption that would result in nearly a quarter of the most inefficient residential buildings remaining unrenovated by 2037,” said Arianna Vitali, secretary general at the Coalition for Energy Savings.
Member states can exempt publicly owned social housing from renovation requirements to prevent rent increases and save on subsidies. With the Commission’s approval, national governments will also be allowed to claim a shortage of skilled workers and a lack of economic viability – for a total of 22 percent of the housing stock. Further relief will apply, among other things, to listed buildings.
On the other hand, the exceptions do not yet go far enough for CSU member of parliament Angelika Niebler: “Social housing in Germany is partly privately owned and thus cannot benefit from the exception, for example.”
Parliament goes somewhat further than the Commission with regard to new buildings and the solar roof obligation. From 2028, new buildings may no longer cause emissions and must be equipped with solar systems where technically and economically feasible. For renovations, the solar obligation is to take effect from 2032.
Environmental Action Germany (DUH) nevertheless considers the deal unsuitable “for setting the necessary framework conditions for a socially just and climate target-compatible transformation of the building sector”. DUH had previously pointed to a loophole for phasing out fossil-fuel heating.
Once the directive comes into force, gas or oil-fired boilers should no longer be allowed to be installed, and from 2035 – or with the approval of the Commission in 2040 – they should disappear completely. But the certification of boilers for renewable energies alone is supposed to be enough to keep them running. Since any gas heating system can run on biomethane, this provision alone could undermine the ban, fears Elisabeth Staudt of DUH.
“Then the MEPs’ proposal also stipulates that any heating system that runs on one percent renewables and 99 percent fossil fuels can be classified as ‘renewable,’” criticizes Jozefien Vanbecelaere of the heat pump association EHPA.
BDEW, on the other hand, draws attention to possible conflicts with another regulation: “It is not expedient that the MEPs want to enable the member states to set individual requirements for gas-based technology options in the future. The ecodesign framework, intended to prevent national market barriers, actually applies to energy requirements for heat generators in the EU internal market.”
However, the Buildings Directive is to be significantly expanded to include the issue of adaptation to climate change. MEPs have tightened up the Commission’s proposals: Member states are to ensure that new buildings are adapted to changes in the climate when they come into force. As an example, the ITRE agreement now explicitly mentions green infrastructure, such as green roofs and walls.
The skilled trades dread the new requirements. “Other topics will be added to the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive,” criticizes Holger Schwannecke, Secretary General of the German Confederation of Skilled Crafts (ZDH). “The adopted draft report gives rise to fears that energy-related renovation and construction will become considerably more complex and expensive.”
The vote in the plenary session of the Parliament is scheduled for mid-March. The Council decided on its general approach months ago. However, a spokesperson for the Swedish Council Presidency explained yesterday that there is no date yet for a first trilogue.
Feb. 13, 2023; 3 p.m.
Euro Group
Topics: Recent developments in energy markets and their impact on the fiscal policy response in the euro area, Thematic discussion – Euro area labor markets: recent developments and challenges ahead, macroeconomic and financial developments and policy coordination in the euro area. Draft Agenda
Feb. 13, 2023; 5-10 p.m.
Plenary session of the EU Parliament: REPowerEU, electoral rights
Topics: Debate on the REPowerEU chapters in recovery and resilience plans, debate on the electoral rights of mobile Union citizens in municipal elections. Draft Agenda
Feb. 14, 2023
Weekly Commission meeting
Topics: Review of the CO2 emission standards for heavy-duty vehicles. Draft Agenda
Feb. 14, 2023; 9 a.m.-10 p.m.
Plenary session of the EU Parliament: CO2 emission standards, Market Stability Reserve, foreign affairs issues
Topics: Debate on CO2 emission standards for cars and vans, vote on the revision of the Market Stability Reserve for the EU Emissions Trading System, debate on foreign affairs issues in the presence of the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy. Draft Agenda
Feb. 14, 2023; 10 a.m.
EU Council: economic and financial affairs
Topics: Exchange of views on the economic and financial impact of Russia’s aggression against Ukraine, adoption of the council implementing decisions under the Recovery and Resilience Facility, Preparation of the G20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors meeting of 24-25 February 2023 – G20 EU terms of reference. Draft Agenda
Feb. 15, 2023; 9 a.m.-10 p.m.
Plenary session of the EU Parliament: Horizon Europe, Central Bank, critical raw materials
Topics: Vote on the joint undertakings under Horizon Europe (Chips Joint Undertaking), debate on the annual report of the European Central Bank 2022, debate on the access to strategic critical raw materials. Draft Agenda
Feb. 16, 2023
ECJ ruling: suspension of enforcement of a European Enforcement Order
Topics: Lufthansa Technik AERO Alzey has obtained a European Enforcement Order against Arik Air before the German courts in relation to a claim of over €2 million euros. Based on this enforcement order, an aircraft belonging to Arik Air was seized in Lithuania. Lufthansa is defending itself before the Lithuanian Supreme Court against the suspension of the enforcement proceedings. This court would like to know from the Court of Justice, among other things, when “exceptional circumstances” exist that can justify a court in the executing State ordering a stay of execution. Schlussanträge
Feb. 16, 2023; 9 a.m.-4 p.m.
Plenary session of the EU Parliament: fertilizers, interpellations
Topics: Debate on the Commission communication on ensuring availability and affordability of fertilizers, debate on major interpellations. Draft Agenda
Feb. 17-19, 2023
Munich Security Conference
Topics: For three days, the Munich Security Conference provides a platform for high-level debates on the greatest foreign and security policy challenges of our time. Infos
The EPP demands the resignation of Jutta Paulus (Greens) as rapporteur for the EU legislative project “Reducing methane emissions in the energy sector”. In a mail to the Green MEP from Giessen, the head of the responsible environment committee, Pascal Canfin (Renew) and others, Christian Ehler (CDU), coordinator in the committee and EPP shadow rapporteur Massimiliano Salini wrote last night: “We have serious doubts about the integrity of the rapporteur.”
Table.Media had reported that the document with the incorporated compromise proposals for their report was not created on a computer in the EP, but on the computer of a lobbyist. Paulus had admitted this but explained that she had only used the formatting template.
Referring to a quote from transparency expert Nina Katzemich of Lobbycontrol in the Table.Media article, the two Christian Democrats go on to write, “Surely you and every single member of the Green Group agree that it is unacceptable for lobbyists to be ‘wielding the pen’ at the very moment when the EP rapporteur is putting together the compromise proposals.” It goes on to say with regard to the Kaili corruption scandal, “Combined with the recent revelations about the alleged influence of third countries on the European Parliament, this affair additionally casts a bad light on our institution.” mgr
No more Russian natural gas has been flowing into the EU via the Nord Stream pipeline in the Baltic Sea and the Yamal pipeline through Poland for months. However, the remaining Ukraine Transit and Turkstream pipelines also become less and less important for the EU’s gas supply. As an evaluation by the Brussels-based think tank Bruegel shows, less than eight percent of the gas imported into the EU flowed through these pipelines in the first five weeks of this year. At the beginning of 2021, the share had still been over 48 percent. The absolute volume of imported Russian pipeline gas has thus fallen by 86 percent within two years.
This could also have an impact on the planned LNG terminals in Germany. Economy Minister Robert Habeck had recently stated that southeastern European countries would also have to be supplied via these if the gas supply from Russia were to be stopped completely. In fact, the latest figures show that the gap is not particularly large. Mathematically, the remaining Russian gas could currently be closed with the existing infrastructure.
Nevertheless, Bruegel believes that the construction of the floating terminals makes sense. This is because they would ensure that there are still reserves even if no gas flows from Russia and the next winters are very cold. If all the planned terminals are also built on land, however, there is a risk of significant overcapacity throughout Europe from 2025, the think tank warns. This is true even in the case of a capacity utilization of only 65 percent.
If each government worked toward its own security of supply, “the EU as a whole would risk building substantial gas overcapacity,” the think tank had warned last year. “This would be an inefficient use of resources and would strengthen interest groups that oppose a rapid gas phase-out,” they said at the time. mkr
Yesterday, the Parliament’s Industry Committee voted against the Green and Renew motion to create an independent association for the future hydrogen networks (ENNOH). Instead, a majority adopted the compromise on the gas market regulation, led by rapporteur Jerzy Buzek (EPP), according to which ENTSOG should be developed into a joint organization of European network operators for natural gas and hydrogen (ENTSOG&H).
“The transfer of hydrogen infrastructure planning to gas grid operators jeopardizes clear guidance on where hydrogen grids make sense and where gas grids need to be dismantled,” said Esther Bollendorff of the Climate Action Network (CAN), commenting on the decision. This poses the risk of an excessive expansion of hydrogen networks and a lock-in of fossil infrastructure.
In addition to the position on the regulation, ITRE yesterday also adopted the compromise of rapporteur Jens Geier (SPD) on the gas market directive.
The position adopted suits the gas distribution system operators. “We expressly welcome the fact that the Parliament has spoken out against corporate unbundling and in favor of the distinction between transmission and distribution network levels. This is a clear signal that the members of parliament recognize the important role of the existing gas network for the energy and heat transition,” said Ingbert Liebing, Chief Executive Officer of the German Association of Local Utilities (VKU). However, the Council currently takes a different position on this issue than the Parliament. ber
The MEPs in the Industry Committee (ITRE) adopted the compromise proposals on the European digital identity (eID) and the Data Act on Thursday with a clear majority. The eID is intended to give EU citizens secure access to public and private digital services – even across national borders. And they are to be able to identify themselves electronically throughout Europe via a wallet app.
In its proposal, the Commission had envisaged a mandatory lifetime personal identification number for every EU citizen. However, the parliamentarians rejected this. Its use should be limited to cross-border administrative services. The criticism was that, in this way, the state could combine information from numerous areas of life and thus create transparent citizens. However, the parliamentarians will have to continue this discussion because the Council has endorsed the Commission’s proposal on this point.
The eID is a decisive step forward, tweeted shadow rapporteur Alin Mituța (Renew) after the vote. He said it would allow EU citizens and businesses to “retain full control over their data and documents.” Angelika Niebler (CSU) stressed that “citizens can use the European digital identity card voluntarily and it is not mandatory.” Patrick Breyer (Pirates) warned, “We have to stand up to the great risk that the planned ‘digital identity’ could gradually displace the anonymity on the Internet that protects us from profiling and identity theft.”
Criticism came from the business community: Jan Oetjen, CEO of the Internet service providers Web.de and GMX, believes it is a design flaw that the planned wallet requires identification with an ID card right at the start. Unlike the Apple and Google wallets, for example, this creates a high hurdle. This will paralyze the intended spread of a Europe-wide ID standard. The EU would also miss the opportunity to establish a competitive alternative to the systems of the US platforms. The wallet must be compatible with mass use cases such as e-mail, messenger or social networks, said Oetjen.
Kim Nguyen, CEO of the trust services provider D-Trust, which is part of Bundesdruckerei (Federal Press), on the other hand, praised the fact that Parliament had “fortunately once again strengthened” citizens’ control options for the wallet. This is “an important basis for the broadest possible acceptance of the wallet“.
As the Council has also already completed its internal work on the eID Regulation and adopted a general approach in December 2022, the way to the trilogue is clear. The process can begin after the vote in plenary – probably in mid-March. For the Data Act, it will take a little longer, as the Council’s general approach is still pending. vis
Yesterday, the Committee on Environment voted on its opinion on the Due Diligence Act. The members of parliament were able to agree on stronger climate requirements. They demand, for example, that companies set themselves climate neutrality targets and be liable for climate damage in their value chains.
“The Environment Committee is sending a strong signal: we want to oblige companies to make their entire value chain climate neutral by 2050,” said rapporteur Tiemo Wölken (SPD). The vote came without the support of the EPP. The latter had withdrawn its support for the compromise text.
The statement also advocates a risk-based approach and calls for companies with 250 or more employees and global sales of €40 million to be covered by the law. Overall, the demands of the Environment Committee are closely aligned with the EU Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), for example, in the definition of adverse environmental impacts. In March, the lead JURI committee votes, and in May the text goes to the plenum. cw
The governor of the autonomous province of Xinjiang, Erkin Tuniyaz, is traveling to London next Sunday on behalf of the Chinese government, where he is expected to meet with representatives of the British Foreign Office. Exactly one week later, Tuniyaz then wants to make an appearance in Brussels to launch a diplomatic charm offensive with the EU member states.
Tuniyaz has been sanctioned by the United States for two years for his role in the human rights violations against Uyghur Muslims in Xinjiang. The US government even refers to Beijing’s treatment of the Uyghurs as genocide. The EU, on the other hand, has so far limited sanctions to four lower-ranking Xinjiang officials, while Tuniyaz is still allowed to enter.
“The governor of Xinjiang is partly responsible for the human rights crimes that the Chinese leadership is still committing in the autonomous region,” MEP Reinhard Buetikofer (Greens) told China.Table. “talks with China must continue. But that excludes people who, like Erkin Tuniyaz, are personally so closely involved in these crimes.”
Criticism also came from the German parliament. “I think this visit is extremely problematic. Offering the governor of Xinjiang a platform would send the wrong signal,” said human rights politician Peter Heidt (FDP). Heidt also believes that Beijing wants to downplay the situation in Xinjiang.
Frank Schwabe (SPD) warns that the Chinese side could exploit the visit for propaganda purposes. “I hope that the Europeans will take a well-prepared, unambiguous communication strategy with them into these talks. Nobody can make the mistake of being misled by the Chinese narrative.” grz
China’s Ambassador to the EU, Fu Cong, warned Brussels against signing a bilateral investment treaty with Taiwan. This would “fundamentally change” EU-China relations and “shake the foundations”. This step will be taken very seriously if it comes to that, Fu said at an event of the European Policy Centre. Fu also criticized visits to Taiwan by EU MPs “and also high-ranking officials from the EU institutions”. So far, several delegations from the European Parliament visited Taipei. However, high-ranking officials from the EU Commission or the European External Action Service (EEAS) have not officially visited Taiwan so far.
Fu rejected comparisons between the Russian invasion of Ukraine and the situation in Taiwan, calling them “two completely different things”. “Ukraine is an independent state, and Taiwan is part of China,” he said, “So there’s no comparability between the two issues.” The Chinese EU ambassador also reiterated Beijing’s position that the war in Ukraine must be resolved through negotiations. “We don’t believe that providing weapons will actually solve the problem.”
China’s EU ambassador also criticized the narrative of a victory for Ukraine. “We are quite concerned about people talking about winning and ‘complete victory’ on the battlefield,” Fu said. He urged to take the “security concerns of both sides” into account. On Thursday, Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelenskiy visited Brussels. Zelenskiy previously met French President Emmanuel Macron and German Chancellor Olaf Scholz in Paris and traveled to London. ari
Few moments shaped David Wortmann’s career as much as his meeting with Arnold Schwarzenegger in 2004. At the time, Wortmann was a research assistant to Hermann Scheer, an SPD member of the Bundestag. Among other things, the team was working on the German Renewable Energy Sources Act (EEG). Then he received an invitation from the man who once played Terminator and had since become governor of California.
Even then, smoking was prohibited in public buildings in the US, so the ex-actor invited us outside: “He received us in a tent in the courtyard of the building. Made up as if we were on a film set and smoking a cigar,” says Wortmann. It didn’t stop there. “Schwarzenegger asked smart questions and let us advise him. This led to a very ambitious climate program in California,” says Wortmann. “That’s when I realized that good work can have an international impact.” For Wortmann, that was a key moment – and the start of a career ripe for change.
Today, Wortmann works as a mediator between business and politics and is very well connected in Berlin and Brussels. He regularly speaks with representatives of governments, ministries, the EU Commission or the Council of Europe. He turned this into a business model back in 2012 and founded the strategy consultancy DWR eco with Doreen Rietentiet. This advises and supports companies and institutions in the green transformation.
In his podcasts “Let’s Talk Change” and “Deep Dive Clean Tech”, he talks with protagonists from business, politics, science and the media about the sustainable transformation of the economy. In “Pod steh uns bei” (“The podcast (Lord) help us”), he regularly assesses the climate policy issues of the week in various host constellations, including together with Luisa Neubauer. He is an entrepreneur, networker and political advisor in one.
Considering his roots, today’s orientation fits all too well. Born in Herdecke, North Rhine-Westphalia, in 1976, Wortmann grew up in the countryside: “During my childhood, I spent a lot of time in the forests and meadows of my rural surroundings,” says Wortmann. “It was a bit of Bullerby: streams, meadows, snow, ponies. We lived on a single remnant farm in Hagen, at the transition from the Ruhr to the Sauerland.”
He later specialized in sustainability and founded the Sustainable Development Forum at the University of Passau while studying economics and political science. Since then, he has been switching back and forth between economics and politics.
As a student assistant, he worked for the Green Party’s Hans-Josef Fell in the Bundestag, then as a research assistant for Hermann Scheer. In 2005, he moved to the start-up First Solar, which is working to lower the cost of solar energy. Then it was back to the government environment: At the German government’s economic development agency, he headed the energy and environment department, lived for a time in Asia, among other places, and brought investors to Germany from around the world.
Even though Wortmann is politically active, he is not currently seeking a direct mandate and thus a move into politics. “I feel comfortable in both worlds, but I can currently make more of a difference in business,” Wortmann says. “I always go where I feel I can make a difference” – and currently that is the position between business and politics. Pascal Mühle