German Economy Minister Robert Habeck has been traveling these days. He toured Germany for three days with the goal of debunking misinformation about heat pumps. So far, sales figures have fallen well short of the Economy Minister’s expectations. Malte Kreutzfeldt analyzes why the situation is nevertheless better than the statistics suggest.
Another technology that could become crucial for climate action is the capture and storage of carbon dioxide using direct air capture (DAC). China successfully tested a DAC plant for the first time, and European and US manufacturers are also reporting successes. Nico Beckert has researched how China and the USA are pushing ahead with the new technology and where major hurdles remain.
In the news, we take a look at the United States and how much Donald Trump’s political ideas would slow down climate action. We also report on two negotiating points that will be relevant at COP29: Countries have submitted their proposals on the new climate finance target and wording on the role of fossil fuels has been softened in an important UN document. Nobel laureates and former heads of state have voiced clear criticism of this. We also report on banks that are failing to meet their climate targets and on green technologies that are becoming increasingly efficient.
Robert Habeck spared no effort in his fight for the heat pump earlier this week. At manufacturer Stiebel Eltron in Holzminden in southern Lower Saxony, he personally helped assemble one of the devices under expert guidance. And in narrow cellars and hot gardens of houses of various sizes in Hanover and Bremen, he inspected newly installed heat pumps and – accompanied by numerous camera teams and journalists – had contractors, residents and landlords tell him how well everything was working.
The Minister of Economic Affairs – just back from a three-week vacation and obviously full of vigor – was determined to turn the heating transition, which the public has tended to perceive as the biggest mistake of his time in office, into a winning issue. The declared aim of the trip was to dispel prejudices against the technology and highlight its benefits. And in some respects, it succeeded.
For example, Habeck was given a demonstration in Laatzen near Hanover that – contrary to what has often been reported in the past – a heat pump can be installed in an existing single-family home without any special requirements. The home owned by 75-year-old Roswitha Mende is a house like millions of others in Germany: A two-story brick house with a secondary suite, in which the windows have been replaced, but with neither an insulated façade nor underfloor heating.
Replacing the 22-year-old gas heating system with a heat pump with an output of 15 kilowatts was nevertheless no problem. This is confirmed by the employees of the nationwide installation company 1Komma5 Grad, who installed the device a few months ago – along with a rooftop PV system, a battery, and a smart meter in the basement. It took less than a week, Mende enthusiastically explained.
The investment also paid off financially; the additional costs compared to a new gas heating system are expected to pay for themselves within a few years, estimated 1Komma5Grad. The heat pump with all its associated equipment costs around 41,000 euros. Retiree Mende only had to pay around 17,000 euros for this, and the German state subsidized the rest. An additional 22,000 euros were spent on the solar system and battery, which are not subsidized but are expected to amortize quickly. This is because they allow the heat pump to be operated with electricity from her own roof – or to draw electricity from the grid with a dynamic tariff whenever it is particularly low.
The state subsidy for Roswitha Mende is comparatively high. Because her taxable income is less than 40,000 euros per year, she receives the maximum subsidy of 70 percent for a portion of the costs. When this so-called income bonus was introduced, some doubted that many people would receive it. However, figures from the KfW Bank, which is responsible for subsidizing, now show that it does play an important role: Accordingly, the income bonus was granted to 35 percent of heat pump applications in the first half of this year; in many cases, these are likely to be elderly retirees for whom a significant proportion of their pension is not taxable income. The grant for the remaining applications is usually 50 or 55 percent of the eligible costs – these are capped.
That is why Habeck is convinced: “The heat pump is a super product – and it pays off,” he repeated in every statement and interview during the trip. He also urged people to hurry because it is unclear whether the subsidy will remain at the same level after the next election. He warned that anyone interested should get it now rather than later. “The time to act is now.”
Habeck found out just how urgent this appeal was on the first evening of his trip to Stiebel Eltron. In the parking lot outside the factory, he had to justify to protesting employees of the heat pump manufacturer that sales figures are developing significantly worse than politicians had predicted. According to the Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Climate Action (BMWK), Germany would have to install 500,000 units per year to meet its climate target in the building sector. However, while the number of heat pumps sold reached a record 356,000 in 2023, sales figures have slumped this year: Around 90,000 were sold in the first half of the year, while the German Heat Pump Association is forecasting 200,000 for the overall year.
Mathematically, this represents a decrease of around 44 percent. However, these numbers actually suggest that the slump is larger than it is. This is because the figures communicated by the heating industry do not indicate how many heat pumps have been installed, but how many have been shipped by manufacturers – and the two figures have recently differed significantly. After the energy price crisis caused by the war in Ukraine led to a sharp rise in demand in late 2022 and early 2023, many distributors and large installers stocked up on heat pumps. When demand slowed down in the second half of last year, they could not get rid of some of them.
The German Heat Pump Association estimates that around 50,000 to 80,000 heat pumps in stock at the turn of the year will not be installed until this year. In order to reflect actual demand, this figure must be deducted from the heat pumps shipped in 2023 and at least partially added in 2024. This still results in a decline between 2023 and 2024 – but it is more likely to be around 10 to 20 percent than 40 percent.
However, this won’t be of much help to manufacturers, who were expecting the market to grow strongly due to the political announcements and have invested in new production facilities accordingly. According to Ulrich Stiebel, Chairman of the Supervisory Board, Stiebel Eltron will have to cut staff – albeit to a lesser extent than the 1,000 jobs recently reported. He expects the “lean period” to last until 2026, when the extensive ban on new gas and oil heating systems originally planned for 2024 will come into force.
On the other hand, Habeck expects sales figures to pick up again sooner. “The mood has shifted,” he said. More and more people are recognizing the advantages of heat pumps. This is shown, for example, by the application figures for heat pump subsidies at KfW, which have recently risen significantly every month; in July, they were around 80 percent higher than in April.
There have been some recent success stories in direct air capture (DAC) technology: China has also successfully tested a larger DAC plant for the first time, and companies such as Climeworks and CarbonCapture have reported new developments. The progress is significant because limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees will require large quantities of CO2 to be removed from the atmosphere and permanently stored. Will China, with its large industrial capacities, also help this technology achieve a breakthrough? What role will the billions in US subsidies play? And what about the developments of Western companies?
The DAC system successfully tested by China for the first time is a so-called CarbonBox fitted in a shipping container. It is capable of filtering 600 tons of CO2 from the ambient air every year. The People’s Republic has already used subsidies to set up mass production in solar and battery manufacturing, significantly contributing to the immense cost reduction in these key energy transition technologies. Could this also work for DAC technologies?
China’s “companies and local governments are looking for the ‘next big thing‘” in climate technologies, says Cory Combs, energy expert at the consulting firm Trivium China, optimistically. As soon as costs and investment risk fall, investment in China could pick up, says Combs. Milestones such as the CarbonBox test are “important signals.” So far, however, the central government has not focused too much on DAC. However, Combs says the central government’s “focus on innovation-driven growth” could provide subsidies and other support for DAC technologies in the future.
“China’s mass production capabilities could help bring down the cost of new types of DAC filters or other equipment,” says Julia Attwood, an industrial decarbonization specialist at BloombergNEF. However, DAC technology differs in many ways from solar panels and batteries, meaning that China’s strengths in mass production would not be as strong:
DAC companies in Europe and the United States also report new developments. For example, the US company CarbonCapture presented a modular DAC system in a shipping container in June 2024, similar to the Chinese CarbonBox. Mass production is set to start in a factory in Arizona. The Swiss company Climeworks also recently announced a breakthrough: New filter material reportedly captures twice as much CO2, uses only half the energy and can be used three times longer than existing technology. The company claims to be well on the way to reducing the cost per ton of CO2 filtered and stored to between 400 and 600 US dollars by 2030. At the current exchange rate, it would be around 360 to 540 euros. At present, the costs are still twice as high. The company believes that technological advances, mass production and larger factories will reduce costs beyond 2030.
These high costs highlight the significant challenges of DAC technology. So far, companies such as Microsoft, JPMorgan Chase, Facebook parent company Meta, Klarna and Stripe have voluntarily purchased carbon credits from DAC systems on a relatively small scale. However, if DAC systems are to offset hundreds of millions of tons of emissions in the future, experts believe a price of 400 US dollars is too high. The target value for the economic viability of DAC was 100 US dollars for many years. However, there is little to suggest that this value will be reached quickly.
Funding projects and tax breaks from the US government could give DAC technology new momentum in the coming years. The Biden administration has earmarked 3.5 billion US dollars in funding, which will be awarded when companies reach certain milestones. The USA initially wanted to use the money to fund four so-called DAC hubs, which include several facilities for filtering and storing CO2. That sounds like a lot of money at first. However, only two promising sites have been found so far. That is why part of the funding is being held back or used for basic research until two more hubs can be found.
The two DAC hubs in Texas and Louisiana could receive up to 1.2 billion US dollars in state funding in the long term. However, the money will be paid out in phases. The Louisiana site, for example, which is expected to filter one million tons of CO2 from the air from 2030, only received 50 million US dollars in funding. The construction of the plant has yet to receive any funding. The project is still at an early stage. The companies involved first have to win over local residents and obtain permits for operation.
Moreover, the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) provides a tax credit of 180 US dollars per ton of CO2 filtered from the atmosphere. Thanks to these support programs, the USA is considered “a leader in political support for DAC,” as the International Energy Agency writes. Both the Democratic and Republican parties support DAC. However, analysts from the consulting firm Rhodium Group warn that even the announced US billions in funding will hardly be enough. They say that in order to create a substantial DAC industry that could capture enough CO2 from the air, “The magnitude of policy necessary to support a gigaton-scale CDR industry is on the order of 20 times larger than current policy support today.”
21. August, 13 Uhr, Leipzig
Lecture Ecosystem vulnerability to compound extremes and disturbances in a changing climate
The German Center for Integrative Biodiversity Research hosts a lecture on the vulnerability of ecosystems to extreme events and disturbances in a changing climate. Info
August 25-29, Stockholm
Action week World Water Week
The theme of this year’s Water Action Week is “Bridging Borders: Water for a Peaceful and Sustainable Future.” Info
It is a glimmer of hope that is often overlooked in the climate crisis: Much of the energy and mobility transition technology already exists – and is constantly improving. Countries do not have to wait for e-fuels, mini-nuclear power plants or nuclear fusion to rapidly cut emissions. Solar and wind power are experiencing an enormous boom worldwide. Photovoltaic systems are becoming increasingly efficient, wind turbines are getting bigger and bigger, batteries can store more and more energy – technical progress has led to enormous cost reductions.
Solar power plants combined with battery storage are already more competitive than new coal-fired power plants in India, for example. Fatih Birol, head of the International Energy Agency, is confident that in a few years, photovoltaics and batteries will also overtake new coal-fired power plants in China and new gas-fired power plants in the United States. Just a few years ago, the success story of renewables was unimaginable. The cleantech revolution is “exponential, disruptive, and now,” writes the Rocky Mountain Institute think tank in a recent report on the energy transition. nib
According to calculations by the US think tank Energy Innovation, a second term of US President Donald Trump could almost completely undo the progress made in US climate policy. If Trump implemented the climate policy elements of “Project 2025,” annual emissions would still amount to 4.92 gigatons of CO2 equivalents in 2030. However, if the current US policy continues, emissions would fall to 4.14 gigatons in 2030. The difference is greater than Germany’s total emissions of 0.67 gigatons of CO2 equivalents in 2023.
According to analysts at Energy Innovation, the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), the Chips and Science Act and new environmental regulations will significantly cut US emissions by 2030. If Trump were to reverse these measures and funding programs, as envisaged by the conservative “Project 2025” led by the Heritage Foundation, hardly any CO2 would be reduced. Energy Innovation’s calculations are based on the assumption that Trump would reverse a large part of the IRA funding. These include tax breaks for electric cars, charging stations, subsidies for establishing green industries, tax breaks for clean electricity, carbon capture and storage (CCS) and hydrogen. However, it remains uncertain whether Trump would completely overturn the Inflation Reduction Act, as many of the tax breaks and new jobs benefit Republican states. nib
About 80 Nobel laureates and former heads of state have criticized in an open letter that fossil fuels are no longer mentioned in a draft of the UN negotiating text for the Summit of the Future. An earlier version of the paper had still referred to an “acceleration” of the “transition away from fossil fuels.” On Tuesday, they called for this wording to be reinstated in the Pact for the Future.
The Summit of the Future will be held in New York from September 20 to 23. It is intended to advance the UN negotiations in the run-up to COP29 in Azerbaijan in November. The mention of fossil fuels in UN climate documents had been repeatedly blocked until COP28 last year – primarily by OPEC members and other major polluters in an attempt to limit their obligations. It was not until 2023 that fossil fuels were mentioned for the first time in a COP final document. At that time, the countries agreed on the phrase “transition away from fossil fuels.” lb
The Arab group of countries is calling on developed countries to contribute at least 441 billion US dollars per year from public funds for international climate financing. In total, the developed countries are urged to mobilize 1.1 trillion US dollars annually between 2025 and 2029. This is according to a submission by the Arab group of countries to the UNFCCC as part of the negotiations on a new global climate finance target. Many other countries and groups of countries remain vague about the amount of the New Collective Quantified Goal on Climate Finance (NCQG).
According to the USA, the NCQG should:
The so-called Like-Minded Developing Countries, which also include China and India, propose the following:
While the EU is reluctant to provide specific figures, it proposes for the donor states to be extended to include countries “with high greenhouse gas emissions and economic capabilities.” The “Group of Least Developed Countries” and the “Small Island Developing States” also do not specify the amount of the NCQG. The African states propose 1.3 trillion US dollars per year between 2025 and 2030. The next round of negotiations on the NCQG will take place between September 9 and 12 in Baku. A final decision is expected at COP29 in November. nib
Last year, almost 12 million hectares of forest were destroyed by wildfires worldwide, an area roughly the size of Nicaragua. This means that 2023 surpassed the previous record from 2016 by 24 percent. This is according to data from the University of Maryland, analyzed by the World Resources Institute (WRI). The data shows that the area burned in 2001 was half as large.
The WRI estimates that the record destruction in 2023 can be attributed primarily to the fires in Canada: They alone account for 65 percent of the areas burned last year. The WRI sees this as an indication that the forests of the boreal zones are “already losing their ability to store carbon.” According to data from the EU’s Copernicus Earth observation program, 23 percent of all wildfire emissions last year can be attributed to fires in Canada.
Severe wildfires have already caused high emissions this year, including in Russia. Severe fires have also recently been reported in Brazil, California and Greece. The fires near the Greek capital Athens are under control for the time being. However, Greece also experienced particularly severe fires last year, as a recently published analysis of Copernicus data shows.
Severe wildfires are expected to become even more frequent in the future. This is because climate change increases the likelihood of extreme heatwaves, which create suitable fire conditions, according to the WRI and Copernicus researchers. Analyses by the World Weather Attribution research initiative confirm the connection. Moreover, wildfires also drive global warming because they release high levels of emissions and destroy important carbon sinks.
In addition to boreal forests, the WRI also sees forests in other climate zones at risk: In the tropics, “the loss of tree cover threatens important protected areas, including intact regions of the Amazon.” The forests of the temperate and subtropical zones, on the other hand, have historically seen “fewer active fires, but these regions are now experiencing an annual increase of 34,300 hectares, an increase of 5.3 percent.”
The proportion of forest destruction attributable to fires has risen from 20 percent in 2001 to 33 percent. According to the WRI, the rest is due to other factors such as mining or deforestation. ae
Many of the world’s largest banks are “not only are banks off-track to meet net-zero targets, but many of their pledges are less ambitious than they seem at face value.” This is the conclusion of a World Resources Institute (WRI) analysis, which examined the activities of the 25 largest banks in six sectors between 2019 and 2022: Oil and gas, electricity, automotive, aviation, cement and steel.
The banks examined do not make a sufficient contribution to meeting the 1.5-degree limit in many sectors. The WRI analysts do not expect this to change by 2030. Although the number of net-zero pledges is increasing overall, banks are increasingly lowering their climate targets, particularly in the United States. The WRI therefore expects emissions to be three times higher than the corresponding emission paths for 1.5 degrees by 2030. This will make correcting the course increasingly difficult.
The report also criticizes the support of some banks for lobby groups that actively campaign against climate laws. The sector is also a long way from the IEA’s 10:1 target, which states that the energy transition will require four trillion US dollars in annual investment by 2030 – ten times more than in fossil fuels. Through their lending, banks play a key role in financing the energy transition and can influence where money flows. However, they currently only invest an average of 1.3 times more in green finance than in fossil fuels. Chinese banks still perform best with an average ratio of 7:1. Deutsche Bank, on the other hand, invests as much money in climate action as it does in fossil fuels. lb
German Economy Minister Robert Habeck has been traveling these days. He toured Germany for three days with the goal of debunking misinformation about heat pumps. So far, sales figures have fallen well short of the Economy Minister’s expectations. Malte Kreutzfeldt analyzes why the situation is nevertheless better than the statistics suggest.
Another technology that could become crucial for climate action is the capture and storage of carbon dioxide using direct air capture (DAC). China successfully tested a DAC plant for the first time, and European and US manufacturers are also reporting successes. Nico Beckert has researched how China and the USA are pushing ahead with the new technology and where major hurdles remain.
In the news, we take a look at the United States and how much Donald Trump’s political ideas would slow down climate action. We also report on two negotiating points that will be relevant at COP29: Countries have submitted their proposals on the new climate finance target and wording on the role of fossil fuels has been softened in an important UN document. Nobel laureates and former heads of state have voiced clear criticism of this. We also report on banks that are failing to meet their climate targets and on green technologies that are becoming increasingly efficient.
Robert Habeck spared no effort in his fight for the heat pump earlier this week. At manufacturer Stiebel Eltron in Holzminden in southern Lower Saxony, he personally helped assemble one of the devices under expert guidance. And in narrow cellars and hot gardens of houses of various sizes in Hanover and Bremen, he inspected newly installed heat pumps and – accompanied by numerous camera teams and journalists – had contractors, residents and landlords tell him how well everything was working.
The Minister of Economic Affairs – just back from a three-week vacation and obviously full of vigor – was determined to turn the heating transition, which the public has tended to perceive as the biggest mistake of his time in office, into a winning issue. The declared aim of the trip was to dispel prejudices against the technology and highlight its benefits. And in some respects, it succeeded.
For example, Habeck was given a demonstration in Laatzen near Hanover that – contrary to what has often been reported in the past – a heat pump can be installed in an existing single-family home without any special requirements. The home owned by 75-year-old Roswitha Mende is a house like millions of others in Germany: A two-story brick house with a secondary suite, in which the windows have been replaced, but with neither an insulated façade nor underfloor heating.
Replacing the 22-year-old gas heating system with a heat pump with an output of 15 kilowatts was nevertheless no problem. This is confirmed by the employees of the nationwide installation company 1Komma5 Grad, who installed the device a few months ago – along with a rooftop PV system, a battery, and a smart meter in the basement. It took less than a week, Mende enthusiastically explained.
The investment also paid off financially; the additional costs compared to a new gas heating system are expected to pay for themselves within a few years, estimated 1Komma5Grad. The heat pump with all its associated equipment costs around 41,000 euros. Retiree Mende only had to pay around 17,000 euros for this, and the German state subsidized the rest. An additional 22,000 euros were spent on the solar system and battery, which are not subsidized but are expected to amortize quickly. This is because they allow the heat pump to be operated with electricity from her own roof – or to draw electricity from the grid with a dynamic tariff whenever it is particularly low.
The state subsidy for Roswitha Mende is comparatively high. Because her taxable income is less than 40,000 euros per year, she receives the maximum subsidy of 70 percent for a portion of the costs. When this so-called income bonus was introduced, some doubted that many people would receive it. However, figures from the KfW Bank, which is responsible for subsidizing, now show that it does play an important role: Accordingly, the income bonus was granted to 35 percent of heat pump applications in the first half of this year; in many cases, these are likely to be elderly retirees for whom a significant proportion of their pension is not taxable income. The grant for the remaining applications is usually 50 or 55 percent of the eligible costs – these are capped.
That is why Habeck is convinced: “The heat pump is a super product – and it pays off,” he repeated in every statement and interview during the trip. He also urged people to hurry because it is unclear whether the subsidy will remain at the same level after the next election. He warned that anyone interested should get it now rather than later. “The time to act is now.”
Habeck found out just how urgent this appeal was on the first evening of his trip to Stiebel Eltron. In the parking lot outside the factory, he had to justify to protesting employees of the heat pump manufacturer that sales figures are developing significantly worse than politicians had predicted. According to the Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Climate Action (BMWK), Germany would have to install 500,000 units per year to meet its climate target in the building sector. However, while the number of heat pumps sold reached a record 356,000 in 2023, sales figures have slumped this year: Around 90,000 were sold in the first half of the year, while the German Heat Pump Association is forecasting 200,000 for the overall year.
Mathematically, this represents a decrease of around 44 percent. However, these numbers actually suggest that the slump is larger than it is. This is because the figures communicated by the heating industry do not indicate how many heat pumps have been installed, but how many have been shipped by manufacturers – and the two figures have recently differed significantly. After the energy price crisis caused by the war in Ukraine led to a sharp rise in demand in late 2022 and early 2023, many distributors and large installers stocked up on heat pumps. When demand slowed down in the second half of last year, they could not get rid of some of them.
The German Heat Pump Association estimates that around 50,000 to 80,000 heat pumps in stock at the turn of the year will not be installed until this year. In order to reflect actual demand, this figure must be deducted from the heat pumps shipped in 2023 and at least partially added in 2024. This still results in a decline between 2023 and 2024 – but it is more likely to be around 10 to 20 percent than 40 percent.
However, this won’t be of much help to manufacturers, who were expecting the market to grow strongly due to the political announcements and have invested in new production facilities accordingly. According to Ulrich Stiebel, Chairman of the Supervisory Board, Stiebel Eltron will have to cut staff – albeit to a lesser extent than the 1,000 jobs recently reported. He expects the “lean period” to last until 2026, when the extensive ban on new gas and oil heating systems originally planned for 2024 will come into force.
On the other hand, Habeck expects sales figures to pick up again sooner. “The mood has shifted,” he said. More and more people are recognizing the advantages of heat pumps. This is shown, for example, by the application figures for heat pump subsidies at KfW, which have recently risen significantly every month; in July, they were around 80 percent higher than in April.
There have been some recent success stories in direct air capture (DAC) technology: China has also successfully tested a larger DAC plant for the first time, and companies such as Climeworks and CarbonCapture have reported new developments. The progress is significant because limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees will require large quantities of CO2 to be removed from the atmosphere and permanently stored. Will China, with its large industrial capacities, also help this technology achieve a breakthrough? What role will the billions in US subsidies play? And what about the developments of Western companies?
The DAC system successfully tested by China for the first time is a so-called CarbonBox fitted in a shipping container. It is capable of filtering 600 tons of CO2 from the ambient air every year. The People’s Republic has already used subsidies to set up mass production in solar and battery manufacturing, significantly contributing to the immense cost reduction in these key energy transition technologies. Could this also work for DAC technologies?
China’s “companies and local governments are looking for the ‘next big thing‘” in climate technologies, says Cory Combs, energy expert at the consulting firm Trivium China, optimistically. As soon as costs and investment risk fall, investment in China could pick up, says Combs. Milestones such as the CarbonBox test are “important signals.” So far, however, the central government has not focused too much on DAC. However, Combs says the central government’s “focus on innovation-driven growth” could provide subsidies and other support for DAC technologies in the future.
“China’s mass production capabilities could help bring down the cost of new types of DAC filters or other equipment,” says Julia Attwood, an industrial decarbonization specialist at BloombergNEF. However, DAC technology differs in many ways from solar panels and batteries, meaning that China’s strengths in mass production would not be as strong:
DAC companies in Europe and the United States also report new developments. For example, the US company CarbonCapture presented a modular DAC system in a shipping container in June 2024, similar to the Chinese CarbonBox. Mass production is set to start in a factory in Arizona. The Swiss company Climeworks also recently announced a breakthrough: New filter material reportedly captures twice as much CO2, uses only half the energy and can be used three times longer than existing technology. The company claims to be well on the way to reducing the cost per ton of CO2 filtered and stored to between 400 and 600 US dollars by 2030. At the current exchange rate, it would be around 360 to 540 euros. At present, the costs are still twice as high. The company believes that technological advances, mass production and larger factories will reduce costs beyond 2030.
These high costs highlight the significant challenges of DAC technology. So far, companies such as Microsoft, JPMorgan Chase, Facebook parent company Meta, Klarna and Stripe have voluntarily purchased carbon credits from DAC systems on a relatively small scale. However, if DAC systems are to offset hundreds of millions of tons of emissions in the future, experts believe a price of 400 US dollars is too high. The target value for the economic viability of DAC was 100 US dollars for many years. However, there is little to suggest that this value will be reached quickly.
Funding projects and tax breaks from the US government could give DAC technology new momentum in the coming years. The Biden administration has earmarked 3.5 billion US dollars in funding, which will be awarded when companies reach certain milestones. The USA initially wanted to use the money to fund four so-called DAC hubs, which include several facilities for filtering and storing CO2. That sounds like a lot of money at first. However, only two promising sites have been found so far. That is why part of the funding is being held back or used for basic research until two more hubs can be found.
The two DAC hubs in Texas and Louisiana could receive up to 1.2 billion US dollars in state funding in the long term. However, the money will be paid out in phases. The Louisiana site, for example, which is expected to filter one million tons of CO2 from the air from 2030, only received 50 million US dollars in funding. The construction of the plant has yet to receive any funding. The project is still at an early stage. The companies involved first have to win over local residents and obtain permits for operation.
Moreover, the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) provides a tax credit of 180 US dollars per ton of CO2 filtered from the atmosphere. Thanks to these support programs, the USA is considered “a leader in political support for DAC,” as the International Energy Agency writes. Both the Democratic and Republican parties support DAC. However, analysts from the consulting firm Rhodium Group warn that even the announced US billions in funding will hardly be enough. They say that in order to create a substantial DAC industry that could capture enough CO2 from the air, “The magnitude of policy necessary to support a gigaton-scale CDR industry is on the order of 20 times larger than current policy support today.”
21. August, 13 Uhr, Leipzig
Lecture Ecosystem vulnerability to compound extremes and disturbances in a changing climate
The German Center for Integrative Biodiversity Research hosts a lecture on the vulnerability of ecosystems to extreme events and disturbances in a changing climate. Info
August 25-29, Stockholm
Action week World Water Week
The theme of this year’s Water Action Week is “Bridging Borders: Water for a Peaceful and Sustainable Future.” Info
It is a glimmer of hope that is often overlooked in the climate crisis: Much of the energy and mobility transition technology already exists – and is constantly improving. Countries do not have to wait for e-fuels, mini-nuclear power plants or nuclear fusion to rapidly cut emissions. Solar and wind power are experiencing an enormous boom worldwide. Photovoltaic systems are becoming increasingly efficient, wind turbines are getting bigger and bigger, batteries can store more and more energy – technical progress has led to enormous cost reductions.
Solar power plants combined with battery storage are already more competitive than new coal-fired power plants in India, for example. Fatih Birol, head of the International Energy Agency, is confident that in a few years, photovoltaics and batteries will also overtake new coal-fired power plants in China and new gas-fired power plants in the United States. Just a few years ago, the success story of renewables was unimaginable. The cleantech revolution is “exponential, disruptive, and now,” writes the Rocky Mountain Institute think tank in a recent report on the energy transition. nib
According to calculations by the US think tank Energy Innovation, a second term of US President Donald Trump could almost completely undo the progress made in US climate policy. If Trump implemented the climate policy elements of “Project 2025,” annual emissions would still amount to 4.92 gigatons of CO2 equivalents in 2030. However, if the current US policy continues, emissions would fall to 4.14 gigatons in 2030. The difference is greater than Germany’s total emissions of 0.67 gigatons of CO2 equivalents in 2023.
According to analysts at Energy Innovation, the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), the Chips and Science Act and new environmental regulations will significantly cut US emissions by 2030. If Trump were to reverse these measures and funding programs, as envisaged by the conservative “Project 2025” led by the Heritage Foundation, hardly any CO2 would be reduced. Energy Innovation’s calculations are based on the assumption that Trump would reverse a large part of the IRA funding. These include tax breaks for electric cars, charging stations, subsidies for establishing green industries, tax breaks for clean electricity, carbon capture and storage (CCS) and hydrogen. However, it remains uncertain whether Trump would completely overturn the Inflation Reduction Act, as many of the tax breaks and new jobs benefit Republican states. nib
About 80 Nobel laureates and former heads of state have criticized in an open letter that fossil fuels are no longer mentioned in a draft of the UN negotiating text for the Summit of the Future. An earlier version of the paper had still referred to an “acceleration” of the “transition away from fossil fuels.” On Tuesday, they called for this wording to be reinstated in the Pact for the Future.
The Summit of the Future will be held in New York from September 20 to 23. It is intended to advance the UN negotiations in the run-up to COP29 in Azerbaijan in November. The mention of fossil fuels in UN climate documents had been repeatedly blocked until COP28 last year – primarily by OPEC members and other major polluters in an attempt to limit their obligations. It was not until 2023 that fossil fuels were mentioned for the first time in a COP final document. At that time, the countries agreed on the phrase “transition away from fossil fuels.” lb
The Arab group of countries is calling on developed countries to contribute at least 441 billion US dollars per year from public funds for international climate financing. In total, the developed countries are urged to mobilize 1.1 trillion US dollars annually between 2025 and 2029. This is according to a submission by the Arab group of countries to the UNFCCC as part of the negotiations on a new global climate finance target. Many other countries and groups of countries remain vague about the amount of the New Collective Quantified Goal on Climate Finance (NCQG).
According to the USA, the NCQG should:
The so-called Like-Minded Developing Countries, which also include China and India, propose the following:
While the EU is reluctant to provide specific figures, it proposes for the donor states to be extended to include countries “with high greenhouse gas emissions and economic capabilities.” The “Group of Least Developed Countries” and the “Small Island Developing States” also do not specify the amount of the NCQG. The African states propose 1.3 trillion US dollars per year between 2025 and 2030. The next round of negotiations on the NCQG will take place between September 9 and 12 in Baku. A final decision is expected at COP29 in November. nib
Last year, almost 12 million hectares of forest were destroyed by wildfires worldwide, an area roughly the size of Nicaragua. This means that 2023 surpassed the previous record from 2016 by 24 percent. This is according to data from the University of Maryland, analyzed by the World Resources Institute (WRI). The data shows that the area burned in 2001 was half as large.
The WRI estimates that the record destruction in 2023 can be attributed primarily to the fires in Canada: They alone account for 65 percent of the areas burned last year. The WRI sees this as an indication that the forests of the boreal zones are “already losing their ability to store carbon.” According to data from the EU’s Copernicus Earth observation program, 23 percent of all wildfire emissions last year can be attributed to fires in Canada.
Severe wildfires have already caused high emissions this year, including in Russia. Severe fires have also recently been reported in Brazil, California and Greece. The fires near the Greek capital Athens are under control for the time being. However, Greece also experienced particularly severe fires last year, as a recently published analysis of Copernicus data shows.
Severe wildfires are expected to become even more frequent in the future. This is because climate change increases the likelihood of extreme heatwaves, which create suitable fire conditions, according to the WRI and Copernicus researchers. Analyses by the World Weather Attribution research initiative confirm the connection. Moreover, wildfires also drive global warming because they release high levels of emissions and destroy important carbon sinks.
In addition to boreal forests, the WRI also sees forests in other climate zones at risk: In the tropics, “the loss of tree cover threatens important protected areas, including intact regions of the Amazon.” The forests of the temperate and subtropical zones, on the other hand, have historically seen “fewer active fires, but these regions are now experiencing an annual increase of 34,300 hectares, an increase of 5.3 percent.”
The proportion of forest destruction attributable to fires has risen from 20 percent in 2001 to 33 percent. According to the WRI, the rest is due to other factors such as mining or deforestation. ae
Many of the world’s largest banks are “not only are banks off-track to meet net-zero targets, but many of their pledges are less ambitious than they seem at face value.” This is the conclusion of a World Resources Institute (WRI) analysis, which examined the activities of the 25 largest banks in six sectors between 2019 and 2022: Oil and gas, electricity, automotive, aviation, cement and steel.
The banks examined do not make a sufficient contribution to meeting the 1.5-degree limit in many sectors. The WRI analysts do not expect this to change by 2030. Although the number of net-zero pledges is increasing overall, banks are increasingly lowering their climate targets, particularly in the United States. The WRI therefore expects emissions to be three times higher than the corresponding emission paths for 1.5 degrees by 2030. This will make correcting the course increasingly difficult.
The report also criticizes the support of some banks for lobby groups that actively campaign against climate laws. The sector is also a long way from the IEA’s 10:1 target, which states that the energy transition will require four trillion US dollars in annual investment by 2030 – ten times more than in fossil fuels. Through their lending, banks play a key role in financing the energy transition and can influence where money flows. However, they currently only invest an average of 1.3 times more in green finance than in fossil fuels. Chinese banks still perform best with an average ratio of 7:1. Deutsche Bank, on the other hand, invests as much money in climate action as it does in fossil fuels. lb