- TTDSG fuels cookie dispute
- Nord Stream 2 cannot be approved says Baerbock
- Federal Office warns of major threat from software security vulnerabilities
- Taxonomy: Scholz speaks of “agitated debate”
- Fishing dispute: Great Britain relents
- FuelEU Maritime: German government calls for faster emissions reduction
- Bitkom survey: Majority sees AI positively
- Opinion: Franco-German disagreement on EU climate policy
“You’ll never walk alone” should become the guiding principle of Germany’s upcoming G7 presidency, Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock said yesterday at the end of the G7 foreign ministers’ consultations in Liverpool. The Liverpool FC fan song expresses “a strong sense of unity”, which Baerbock obviously also wishes for the group of seven leading industrialized nations. The G7 were united once again on the issue of the Ukraine crisis, urging Russia to de-escalate and threatening massive consequences in the event of an attack. “Any use of force to change borders is strictly prohibited under international law,” the draft final declaration reads.
Russia was also the topic of Chancellor Olaf Scholz’s official visit to Warsaw yesterday, but with a different focus: Nord Stream 2. The second controversial topic at the meeting with Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki: the EU’s rule of law dispute with Poland. Scholz avoided harsh criticism and instead said that he very much hoped that the EU Commission and the Polish government would come to an agreement.
At the beginning of the month, the new Federal Act on the Regulation of Data Protection and Privacy in Telecommunications and Telemedia (TTDSG) came into force, transposing the E-Privacy Directive into German law. Torsten Kleinz analyses why the law is once again fuelling the dispute about the conditions under which providers may use cookies or process other end device data.
The FuelEU Maritime Regulation aims to increase demand for renewable and low-carbon fuels in the maritime sector without creating competitive disadvantages for European players. Lukas Scheid reports on why the reduction targets of the law do not go far enough for the German government.
Jasmin Kohl

Feature
TTDPA fuels cookie dispute
On December 1st, the new Federal Act on the Regulation of Data Protection and Privacy in Telecommunications and Telemedia (TTDPA) came into force. The Act fully transposes the ePrivacy Directive into German law for the first time. Although data protection authorities have been referring directly to the European template for years, the new regulations require some adaptation on the part of companies.
The TTDPA supplements the General Data Protection Regulation, in particular with regard to the question under which conditions providers may set cookies or process other data of the end devices. “The new line of argument thus becomes the exception in Section 25 (2) TTDPA,” explains lawyer and data protection expert Joerg Heidrich to Europe.Table. According to the provision, a users’ active consent is not required if “the use of the cookies or the integration of third-party services is absolutely necessary.” But what does that mean in concrete terms?
TTDPA interpretation leads to new dispute
Several German data protection supervisory authorities have already announced a narrow interpretation. It is undisputed that cookies may be used if, for example, the content of a shopping cart is to be secured. However, what is considered “absolutely necessary” beyond that will lead to disputes: Many website operators have so far included functions such as reach measurement or basic cookies for the integration of advertising under this category. But the authorities no longer want to accept such economic necessity. In case of doubt, providers should refrain from using specific techniques in view of the growing consent fatigue of users.
- Consumer protection
- Cookie-Banner
- Data
- Data Governance Act
- Data protection
- Digital policy
Continue reading now
… and get free access to this Professional Briefing for a month.
Are you already a guest at the Europe.Table? Log in now