Focus topics


RCEP against China’s vulnerability

Dieser Inhalt ist Lizenznehmern unserer Vollversion vorbehalten.
  • Provisions in China’s Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) differ vastly from each other, depending on partner country and time of signing.​
  • China’s FTAs with developed countries contain stronger rules on IPR, SOEs and competition, whereas China’s FTAs with developing countries include weaker rules, especially on trade restrictions. ​
  • Besides China, RCEP includes ASEAN, Japan, South Korea, Australia, and New Zealand, making it the world’s largest trade agreement, covering ca. 30% of global GDP.​
  • RCEP sets more advanced standards than many Chinese FTAs with developing countries, as it includes significant provisions on Services, Investments, and Competition.​
  • But RCEP is less comprehensive than China’s previous FTAs with developed countries: no stipulations on subsidies, SOEs or ESG standards (labor and environment) even though environmental provisions have generally become part of China’s FTA strategy.​
  • Foreign companies with supply chains located in RCEP will benefit from harmonization of product origin rules and improved trade facilitation.​
  • However, European companies are also likely to face increased competitive pressure from Chinese companies moving forcefully into RCEP markets. ​

Sinolytics is a European consulting and analysis company that focuses entirely on China. It advises European companies on their strategic orientation and concrete business activities in China.

Related

    Social Credit System not only affects companies
    Social credit law already affects companies
    Will the digital yuan become an international model?
    Foreign investors welcome in China’s ports